From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:31:41 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <20161207.090954.2116981160523579782.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <87h96g5dlu.fsf@petton.fr> <87vauwghyb.fsf@gmail.com> <87eg1k5951.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481106737 11103 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2016 10:32:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:32:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 25129@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 11:32:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZWH-00028O-JR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:32:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZWL-0005Uh-D3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:32:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZWB-0005Tr-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZW6-0000mV-Cf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZW6-0000mQ-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZW6-0007sh-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25129 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25129-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25129.148110671230278 (code B ref 25129); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 10:31:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZVw-0007sH-Dl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:31:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:33085) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEZVu-0007s5-EJ for 25129@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 05:31:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id 3so23123369pgd.0 for <25129@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 02:31:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=xURvVEENvZeBR9CcC+uQ/Redbz7X5krQx6KC2PHoKmE=; b=dDo3VE9vG6c8IlSYdu5KHH1yPtLWvD01SFyZMuGsrcGw74dEnwroN3fBu9AZmORHOu 1MIphHAmI4aVeSYWPqDB+b0cmCzEZkiKTQeLZlGCrRZUQqczyPbuCUwalWSaNq+QZWgN OZMcwkEaSRmbEecxkDX50Q4Cq3mB+M4Ilse1iJnC/tgEJ1+OUFTQRk3DUxRisPvyMY1p uqXyIy8+pgmc17GALXl640n/2+4ZecrSYQ+cjhJMgAObAaXocPbTlepOI6koHOu9zMSg pv2vZHWNtWW21VUZSJBY9tDeg3gXegYsyP1YLZ8gzD/Vvp5hDiKqA8l5FvIJy/6dEySD 76Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=xURvVEENvZeBR9CcC+uQ/Redbz7X5krQx6KC2PHoKmE=; b=Gtg+9b2DjoVmSl5RDs/kwFkvKSxUH3t5foL3Z0UKK2XhJ3pzT8TOC/dsd6o5u+YIDR 7vb8jX8FNxnsX1ibcfIx7x9Rv3mVD0RhEg/5z9ouNmFqt0kE7ZluL2Tl7qw06h6fC+DX MHPPhilhdKJL9bD9ii0IpICUz46BnQb0TIlDvW7EK8xAQ8IhotutEFmxJn2LikmY9U3h CI+wXiIPBAN220YX0oLpS2gbP6jAeaf7qnJOGqwf5tdpH2VJE9FRuaSO+Lz11EHqHWjo jJnFPc3y3DN02gxAnoF+J4vzn3r+vX8K01rwCfV5K+4u+Ik1sUWxrxG7MFUcUFkzTsmp fpRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02jh64k3BKSy+dC/1E6U8+hyJZ53pNJtqtj8clTZdDG017597o3KYzm1QxCgkEIww== X-Received: by 10.98.34.68 with SMTP id i65mr67537368pfi.135.1481106704668; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 02:31:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (pl676.nas813.p-iwate.nttpc.ne.jp. [124.154.237.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm41368319pfx.65.2016.12.07.02.31.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 02:31:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87eg1k5951.fsf@petton.fr> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126594 Archived-At: On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Nicolas Petton wrote: > Tino Calancha writes: > >> Nicolas Petton writes: >> >>> Pierre Lorenzon writes: >>> >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>>> I well understand now that I must use seq-find instead of >>>> seq-some but I think that I will not be the only one being >>>> confused by these functions specifications ! >>> >>> There is a mistake (extra if) in the documentation, I will fix that. >>> >>> Other than that, is the following less confusing? >>> >>> Return non-nil if PRED returns non-nil for at least one element of SEQUENCE. >>> If so, return the value returned by PRED. > >> The previous doc string contains more information: it explicitely says >> that it returns the _first_ non-nil (PRED element). > > Indeed, what about: > > Return non-nil if PRED returns non-nil for at least one element of SEQUENCE. > If so, return the first non-nil value returned by PRED. Yeah better. The first line with the repetition of 'non-nil' sounds a little poetic. How about? Return non-nil if PRED is satisfied for at least one element of SEQUENCE. If so, return the first non-nil value returned by PRED.