From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jpff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25891: 25.2; Reply inRMAIL sometimes fails Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:58:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <4660-Mon27Feb2017150200+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505851283 3029 195.159.176.226 (19 Sep 2017 20:01:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:01:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) Cc: 25891@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Charles A. Roelli" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 19 22:01:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duOhk-0000I0-IY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:01:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOhs-0007Nm-13 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOgg-0006Zi-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOgd-00077g-A8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duOgd-00077K-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duOgc-00034U-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: jpff Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25891 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 25891-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25891.150585114411704 (code B ref 25891); Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25891) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2017 19:59:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duOfg-00032i-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from west.codemist.co.uk ([217.155.197.248]:59876 helo=codemist.co.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duOfe-00032I-4Y for 25891@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.16.4.42] (helo=snout.codemist.co.uk) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1duOfc-0003yI-2w; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:59:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-ACL-Warn: No reverse lookup X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137146 Archived-At: I will look out a example -- may take a while On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Charles A. Roelli wrote: >> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:02:00 +0000 >> From: jpff >> >> >> I was replying to the message >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> [...] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> which is ill formed. This has been haappening for some yeas but I >> finally had time to record it(!). Seems related to the > > Can you clarify what is ill-formed? Also, could you send a mbox > containing the message that causes the issue, along with a way to > reproduce the issue without any customizations (i.e. from emacs -q)? >