From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:44:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <5B557ACA.4020106@gmx.at> <5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at> <5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at> <5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at> <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> <5BC4DB0E.3050501@gmx.at> <5BC6E4F2.2030607@gmx.at> <83pnw7qsxu.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8hjxrk2.fsf@gmail.com> <5BC8B7A4.8020405@gmx.at> <87ftx24c4s.fsf@gmail.com> <5BC99700.1050309@gmx.at> <87o9bq3trg.fsf@rub.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539960199 13090 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2018 14:43:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:43:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Cc: Robert Pluim , 22000@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 16:43:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDVzc-0003GA-G7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:43:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50968 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW1i-0007O3-Uq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW1R-0007JS-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW1O-0000QW-1O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW1N-0000QK-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW1N-0003Kf-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.153996026612750 (code B ref 22000); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 14:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 14:44:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW0o-0003Ja-A6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ceres.etla.org ([85.119.82.193]:49277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW0m-0003JR-Bk for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:44:24 -0400 Original-Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net ([88.99.213.221] helo=[10.112.101.20]) by ceres.etla.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gDW0k-0001cx-Hf; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:44:22 +0100 X-X-Sender: vivek@platypus.pepperfish.net In-Reply-To: <87o9bq3trg.fsf@rub.de> X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ceres.etla.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > There are a couple of visual oddities: when the `menu-bar-scrollbar' > frame parameter has the value nil or `forced-resize' (or when the item Could you grab screenshots (just the rectangle around the glitch will suffice - don't need the whole X window or screen)? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151443 Archived-At: > There are a couple of visual oddities: when the `menu-bar-scrollbar' > frame parameter has the value nil or `forced-resize' (or when the item Could you grab screenshots (just the rectangle around the glitch will suffice - don't need the whole X window or screen)? Makes it easier to compare/debug/etc.