From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:13:06 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <5B52E425.8010608@gmx.at> <5B543148.1010004@gmx.at> <5B557ACA.4020106@gmx.at> <5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at> <5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at> <5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at> <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> <5BC4DB0E.3050501@gmx.at> <5BC6E4F2.2030607@gmx.at> <5BC83F03.4050006@gmx.at> <83pnw7qsxu.fsf@gnu.org> <5BC8B792.3080806@gmx.at> <83efcnqj4b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539882776 27195 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2018 17:12:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:12:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Cc: 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 18 19:12:51 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBqt-0006xQ-Dh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:12:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43537 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBsz-0007CL-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBsA-0006CP-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBs4-0003UJ-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBs2-0003Rj-MN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBs2-0007ed-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.153988279029357 (code B ref 22000); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2018 17:13:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBrB-0007dR-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ceres.etla.org ([85.119.82.193]:38919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBrA-0007dJ-Nx for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net ([88.99.213.221] helo=[10.112.101.20]) by ceres.etla.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gDBr9-000640-Cs; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:13:07 +0100 X-X-Sender: vivek@platypus.pepperfish.net In-Reply-To: <83efcnqj4b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ceres.etla.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Oh, I'm quite sure we want this on master, I'm just struggling with > the idea of having all that non-trivial code on the release branch. > > Does anyone else have an opinion, or can offer one? Only that I find the current size-jitter extremely annoying, which is admittedly a very subjective thing. The actual merge window does not matter so much to me because, well, I already have a patched emacs on my system(s) by this point. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- -------------------- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151390 Archived-At: > Oh, I'm quite sure we want this on master, I'm just struggling with > the idea of having all that non-trivial code on the release branch. > > Does anyone else have an opinion, or can offer one? Only that I find the current size-jitter extremely annoying, which is admittedly a very subjective thing. The actual merge window does not matter so much to me because, well, I already have a patched emacs on my system(s) by this point.