From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:03:30 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <5B4EE5AF.5000304@gmx.at> <5B504994.3090202@gmx.at> <5B5199F7.7000303@gmx.at> <5B51D6C4.9030006@gmx.at> <5B52E425.8010608@gmx.at> <5B543148.1010004@gmx.at> <5B557ACA.4020106@gmx.at> <5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at> <5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at> <5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at> <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539424932 13977 195.159.176.226 (13 Oct 2018 10:02:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:02:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Cc: 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, David Engster To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 13 12:02:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGkI-0003Wt-A9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 12:02:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGmO-0005kI-PI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGmF-0005ie-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGmA-0003pw-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGmA-0003pi-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGmA-0000lJ-F3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.15394250152891 (code B ref 22000); Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2018 10:03:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGli-0000kY-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ceres.etla.org ([85.119.82.193]:60901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGlg-0000kQ-P4 for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 06:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from yaffle.pepperfish.net ([88.99.213.221] helo=[10.112.101.20]) by ceres.etla.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gBGlf-0004Od-4C; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 11:03:31 +0100 X-X-Sender: vivek@platypus.pepperfish.net In-Reply-To: <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ceres.etla.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > then there is no compaction - at least by default. Is there a > parameter I would have to set via 'default-frame-alist' here? Should be unconditional. I'll see what I can do, I may have to spin up a chroot with 3.4.x and investigate. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151205 Archived-At: > then there is no compaction - at least by default. Is there a > parameter I would have to set via 'default-frame-alist' here? Should be unconditional. I'll see what I can do, I may have to spin up a chroot with 3.4.x and investigate.