From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4048: 23.1; erc-server-reconnect-attempts does not work Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:29:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265770359 13753 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2010 02:52:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:52:39 +0000 (UTC) To: 4048@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 03:52:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2gl-00036l-UW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:52:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nf2gl-0000Tl-AX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nf2gh-0000TY-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56506 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nf2gh-0000TK-29 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2gf-0004oy-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54999) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2gf-0004oq-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2M2-0006oL-86; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Vivek Dasmohapatra Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4048 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,erc X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4048-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4048.126576904926173 (code B ref 4048); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4048) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2010 02:30:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2Ld-0006o1-04 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:30:49 -0500 Original-Received: from flounder.pepperfish.net ([87.237.62.181]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nf2Lb-0006ns-F6 for 4048@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by flounder.pepperfish.net with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Nf2L5-0000bl-Cf for <4048@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:30:03 +0000 X-X-Sender: vivek@octopus.pepperfish.net User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:31:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:35000 Archived-At: I just tried connecting to localhost with M-x erc (no irc server listening there) and I didn't see this behaviour: A few followup questions: Is erc-server-connect-function customised? Was this an irc connecton which was previously established, whose connection was then killed, which erc subsequently kept trying to connect to? Was this a connection using tls/ssl or a regular plaintext irc connection? I'm sure the situation you describe can arise, I may have seen something similar myself, but merely initiating a connection to a port where no server is listening does not suffice to reproduce it here - If you can think of any other details which might help to reproduce this behaviour, I'd be interested in those too.