From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16155: 24.3.50; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:49:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <749544c4-49e7-462f-b64c-26725cf35a59@default> <13d75185-288f-4b71-bb80-e5af13a7f8c6@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387929085 13857 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 23:51:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 23:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org, josh@foxtail.org, Richard Stallman , acm@muc.de To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 25 00:51:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbl3-00024z-3k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:51:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbl2-00076w-I8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbkq-00075m-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbkc-0005T4-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:51:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbkc-0005T0-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbkc-0003Dp-EB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 23:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16155 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138792900612289 (code B ref -1); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 23:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 23:50:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39916 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbjh-0003C8-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvbjc-0003Bb-Ja for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvbjS-000581-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:50:00 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvbjS-00057w-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvbjL-0006ph-3F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvbjD-00057C-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from xvm-90.mit.edu ([18.181.2.90]:51806 helo=mod-relay.xvm.mit.edu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvbjD-000577-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mod-relay.xvm.mit.edu (Postfix) id 7CA4D1EE6A; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail.muc.de (colin.muc.de [193.149.48.1]) by mod-relay.xvm.mit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A16F1EDF7 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:49:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 37943 invoked by uid 3782); 24 Dec 2013 23:49:32 -0000 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82556 Archived-At: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Are those programming modes? Maybe you're right for programming modes, >> but you made the change for Text modes too. > I'm not sure if/why there should be a difference. Maybe the behavior > needs to be adjusted for text-mode (i.e. for the case where > indent-line-function is `indent-relative'), but I don't think it applies > to all text modes (e.g. latex-mode, nxml-mode, ...). There is a difference. I think this change (which to be explicit, is the swapping of the actions of the key bindings RET and C-j) should be made for programming modes only right now. Or possibly with certain specific other modes which are "like" programming modes. But in text-mode, RET should not indent and C-j should (regardless of what a user may have installed on indent-line-function). If there is demand for this swap in other modes, we can always add it later. > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).