From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19809: 24.4; f90-beginning-of-subprogram wrong behavior with string continuation Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:09:06 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423681827 25869 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2015 19:10:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19809@debbugs.gnu.org To: Raul Laasner Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 20:10:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfy-0007lJ-G5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:10:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfx-0005Hb-S2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfm-000555-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfi-0007H5-Af for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:10:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfi-0007Gt-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcfh-0007B9-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19809 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19809-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19809.142368175027526 (code B ref 19809); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19809) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2015 19:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40336 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLces-00079u-3X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59738 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLceq-00079m-77 for 19809@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLcep-0004EO-0m; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:09:07 -0500 X-Spook: World Trade Center Indigo Abbas emc JFK Verisign Clinton X-Ran: |g#JZ}NfpQk{_u*s{#8wBsce[7hms8y&htTtdfD|cGHux;;iH'MscZ((m9dS=R/\{T^\$K X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Raul Laasner's message of "Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:53:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99258 Archived-At: Raul Laasner wrote: > I don't think the standard requires the second '&', although it is > recommended. By my reading, it does require it. Quoting from FCD 1539-1: 3.3.2.4 Free form statement continuation: [...] If a character context is to be continued, an "&" shall be the last nonblank character on the line and shall not be followed by commentary. There shall be a later line that is not a comment; an "&" shall be the first nonblank character on the next such line and the statement continues with the next character following that "&". Maybe it has changed in newer version of the standard.