From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24206: 25.1; Curly quotes generate invalid strings, leading to a segfault Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:46 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <8337m7h1dp.fsf@gnu.org> <83zioffew5.fsf@gnu.org> <83popaf1yz.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn0u3rqc.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83mvkdg91i.fsf@gnu.org> <8b78f23f-4a4f-e568-b760-3350ca7bb8d3@cs.ucla.edu> <83eg5og4n9.fsf@gnu.org> <17f39e7e-31d1-62e5-367d-833b957a39e3@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471370186 23622 195.159.176.226 (16 Aug 2016 17:56:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 24206@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 19:56:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZib5-0005pZ-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 19:56:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43456 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZib2-0007HD-7U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZias-0007GJ-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZiao-0005jJ-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZian-0005j4-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZian-0004qR-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24206.147137015618613 (code B ref 24206); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2016 17:55:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZiah-0004q8-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:44744) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZiag-0004pv-6Z for 24206@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1521612E8; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id NfzfvGc30Rw9; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1341B161309; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YqB-ONZB274F; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3A4A1612E8; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122283 Archived-At: John Wiegley wrote: > I'm rather disturbed by patches being added to emacs-25 which "fail > spectacularly". So am I. > Can you please ensure that there is intensive testing being > done on these patches before pushing them to our release branch? My name is on the "To:" line of your email, so are you under the impressi= on that=20 I pushed the patch? I did not, and would not have done so. Eli wrote and=20 installed the patch, despite my recommendation of a different patch that = would=20 have avoided the failure. So this is really more a matter for Eli.