From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sebastian Urban Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35044: 25.2; Description of "disappearing" faces (Emacs Manual) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:55:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <875zr9vf90.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7ghsqms.fsf@gmail.com> <91458fc2-3478-998d-f34d-ae2145d07936@gmail.com> <87a7gdq6ca.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="152313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cc: 35044@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 27 18:10:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPuN-000dXd-LU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:10:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPuM-0002sx-CT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPuF-0002sh-UN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPgI-0001a8-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPgI-0001Zd-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPgI-0006f5-3s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sebastian Urban Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35044 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35044-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35044.155638056025597 (code B ref 35044); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35044) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2019 15:56:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPgF-0006em-Qh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:56:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:40373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hKPgD-0006eZ-EF for 35044@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:55:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id h11so8730237wmb.5 for <35044@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a6qGdovm7b7mc/bBfrMmpbJTcym6Jik93g9ehU1mtqQ=; b=ScFGvlbw5Ax2woT72ObeW6DCBKGdrwsvjoTSDZ8t4JtRJOHFTt5A4xnwT6ae39zdsH BnZEeaYOVo+KxIuwnyecjNqEt4MStFwGsdktdpd89wIxS4Set/JRUCVW19lpwBKVjByd rqFWLYHttKA7P3eJGXAs6IwxNM5gVLRN7If1IhzTNDaH1hQTeKDDbMypfxCCD3R2qwWM D6ndIqgoT78G/ku1UkF3CeEVjAAQD5ne1FsJ3RkXnado5As8Hs4SFaI7+DG/R4vm8XeL kWotm7PONchcsptzyoj/bU3/KBzovSRw5FO73bUdeEPto6fEnnppBZ0XV/fCfdUJf/WQ 7Y8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a6qGdovm7b7mc/bBfrMmpbJTcym6Jik93g9ehU1mtqQ=; b=HcJ9UcOH+DYqb0MZNXbdudj+OT3vNP+ophOwznVcFGMzIVxKp4noxmLJlCbJKVfs8H MQBPpwqb1X//6/KLo/mdJgz2dGs5KJIlsgwKUnNFisMLUVHW4UDgb6ns9tTfp4qKQw8T 3wr0RwMJ70Xhv1MCbw+5MepI9DMJ1JTKJap2Ve8rvd455iK5JRdXV/vd5vqq35T5j/Df LZkHNfdomwc8rQxl4c9Cy+K2AJegFV0AsCo1xmwqPBJN7kCa4B959ctBpWPvMllFePJj JJB0fu3xOk2VPGOBiWgz5u1swcDmfgOoS5cyjkmO9FE+hZ6/YXYnq4fIic/9SmZ66BT/ YHCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdzxti76BwvY+rxXJkerT8bMZ///eIbUmGkQdwGeicfit2KsGV 9l/naUeoXUBr12wg/im1bdRjcPVx X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwUVICgXCa1ky3khPaZn1urLNZybnL1Q8xEPlc90b151EsjeArF52eLjoTtYf0NIQq7/CDw3A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2104:: with SMTP id h4mr11678789wmh.146.1556380551381; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.42.148] (public-gprs353482.centertel.pl. [37.47.12.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm9094269wmj.20.2019.04.27.08.55.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:55:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87a7gdq6ca.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-GB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158357 Archived-At: To sum things up, approach for this bug won't be updating "Emacs manual", because it could end up as an excuse for bug(s), but rather: 1. updating "Elisp manual" with advice to use 'font-lock-face' over 'face' (which you already did with patch) - dev pov, 2. updating "table.el" to use 'font-lock-face' instead 'face' - user pov. But won't it (especially point 2.) start a "face hunt", because there may be other functions/modes that have the same problem - using 'face' when they should use 'font-lock-face'... or should I just don't care until it happen? S. U.