From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24790: Acknowledgement (Segmentation fault when changing default font on master) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:50:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8f8a8336-7e3f-27aa-9b66-6cbd313edb16@live.com> <837f8wwe1m.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ng5GbetSwwXJbFKgWBaKORvBghnEMCEXu" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477417955 21304 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2016 17:52:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:52:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Cc: 24790@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 19:52:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5tb-0003zh-Pi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:52:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5te-0000tK-7G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:52:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5sQ-0000GY-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5sM-0000NK-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5sM-0000N5-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5sM-0005Jc-9Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24790 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24790-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24790.147741783620396 (code B ref 24790); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24790) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2016 17:50:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5rv-0005Iu-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:55471) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5rt-0005Ig-Sp for 24790@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.26.2.123] ([18.26.2.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1XmT-1cnKyR2YDh-00tPjL; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:50:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <837f8wwe1m.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x6M+5m4oe4WG4TNEKxUPZkexgd7tgPBSRhqxLosaVBBxsImlFgx q6kus7PoLREIj9hI4zRQIpYR5+zbGefBV28xzrofGZgk2r3zaTVnsdEMXmBy9EiH/qH4/sM pdkRQ8AXHeLn/pfiqF96F96RaHnuHKvYbzYzPSeJ4Cw4FLuTnrKYN2Qx+Nl6M5khxQZ2iOv woLg+8M3CbcV6aSe4h0Wg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cycYXy+5jug=:6rWO1O6pX+FBAiHK8J4GdM ZhIJsZYDUUVq/MBpRUySZ5bu73WAbIjDizGTeWZooqmho9E0k5I1hbkXlSa5HJe1RgInF5vCW NUxbsk5VD2UpMGAfY//3p7Ja/n8V2MGrNIAlhcKQJb5ponhyETKfmiEbuTBCrKHHrI9gS6Sp+ dmpyfI0oc3ffwrxFtVL1s/5nT7CvVFcwS3BxLv0+T4aknsGnBzON1T2Ph38sK3uH7/7K+tYdW vQ8pEmDkDV2goqtsvsL4t4tZ3rt9Ur+q2GtcGphDAnjsSyOPmUdZi6W7jC48fBQxFK8DRgF4v x8JE6OdEbVqKwU4OG2pOCvVi8lW97CNNCPH+eGSvlv+Q+yqWHNw+oAP9ZJUGPS5ufuVTatY1a GYAYV/VolQpyq9h3ouzcfIDWYJ0qS8UkQKGmBML5OyhCjMkgDz2vFC00u1HWiHfgb/Y8c3UFt w2KjsL7UrdW3As++e4ZHOQGucwGRswcSYDSq4diD+fAG+VoIZuEJzrTQn4oWd6/FRu9GrWe1l BLdLPCqTWxTsMJrdwF/yQmNvOVq0Ste0xCqWaWaygrvnXrPLIE/y2K6J3WFoGXtOwHPOwbYRn Y5NG58kuuMPrjCLKxt4I4L5cxOZuFJaAn+PM4MNQaND7hzw3pA2QDVtPviaZlCMxJ1wy1ZdgL T7Wz0aVG7Bqq0EqV4nxTI2ygxauWw625THHSC7JC6fupLF14DcPiDvQPDgfBCfUYc+cs= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125008 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ng5GbetSwwXJbFKgWBaKORvBghnEMCEXu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="mbX9qbMpDf4iwjS0mmO0qdkBFOc04mBx8"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24790@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24790: Acknowledgement (Segmentation fault when changing default font on master) References: <8f8a8336-7e3f-27aa-9b66-6cbd313edb16@live.com> <837f8wwe1m.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <837f8wwe1m.fsf@gnu.org> --mbX9qbMpDf4iwjS0mmO0qdkBFOc04mBx8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-10-25 13:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel >> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:05:35 -0400 >> >> The issue seems to be that the font has self-intersecting glyphs; stil= l, this shouldn't crash Emacs. >=20 > What do you mean by self-intersecting glyphs? >=20 > The backtrace you posted has nothing to do with drawing, AFAICT, it > happens inside internal-set-lisp-face-attribute, which attempts to > open a font, and dies inside AREF during that. >=20 > So I don't necessarily see how the glyphs could be related, at least > not with the data you provided. The only thing that seems obviously wrong with the font that I posted is = that some of the paths of its glyphs are self-intersecting (or at least F= ontForge says so). I thought it could be relevant to mention this. Let me know what data I could provide to help shed light on the issue (I'= ll remove my cache-related patch and send the results in a separate reply= ) :) Cl=C3=A9ment. --mbX9qbMpDf4iwjS0mmO0qdkBFOc04mBx8-- --ng5GbetSwwXJbFKgWBaKORvBghnEMCEXu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYD5taAAoJEPqg+cTm90wj/xkP/ibdYtYgMEHrG/+lJSZgKAtQ J+FqHPIAcvW6/NSqOLS/1X9vut5/b72zju53akTNjaSBRlY/UltiNbRxJSw3CRsT FQH0S5kotvA8jgW4ecNJh4em0Xh25TeNcDfGqtRWG+h0WTvkv/In8Dwx9uJJplt+ WtfZoxE9qY9hDiWXbT+gZcpn8/ythgfMq5DNzpsJgLkpTuhnj8U/Y1/onUVWBT+A T3oORwsCwbzIXNK+HvDf2KtttMAvFxJrLde9kN2WUD9kYUBvfELTaRpriZcQ1XLt 5Yry7AGLeSMHFa6gEcyqsnyWuTaP/YDPseJADiRrDcdq/WTL6ifANDpZ9mVk4b9u DzMrEz5HYiqRbSqjfiy/yTN0nwlO0Q4A4EoyyERuSw8xCFSbYnDCw+685C3qhU8I hTRdnPNwsblmJHyxm0IQrKiJ4EtWUZUjdxl7XsNIMhBrmjzRNS0QfHYQUjBbhovU UOmex6KPXpAQLY6dkmFokO/ShNorKUb5bQViWUqvkWbNn+0FGXSqDv4BeD+X74FX nAoQHrLQ/QKWfG9+Sfea55Wdy3DASybEUwsxZYAsBk+FEAGFNeaXqRW+ZPhDKzHe BIv7ZrE5l8O6PSZZj3mP6/xgwj3GWV1SxUu21XcvOgWmuIBFvPFCIHu/4ABC3L8m bdagLzkhXNBkdNALWsBY =TpyG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ng5GbetSwwXJbFKgWBaKORvBghnEMCEXu--