From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35860: Delayed window positioning after buffer display Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:41:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87o93ucjsi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ef4p7prf.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7fc51qm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83k1eg5pmx.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1efhkgp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <2347769f-9ab3-c1b6-699e-4e89a7d8eb1c@gmx.at> <875zpb4zdw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878su5i67f.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87muik3svu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4d0733b1-4ee0-222b-395a-8f26ff76f2da@gmx.at> <87imt6jva7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h88p8e5z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rzsdj5a.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4465efef-794f-de5d-ed5d-04403680a622@gmx.at> <87a7edxmup.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="204624"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35860@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 09:51:26 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrqu-000r46-Ep for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:51:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44630 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrqt-0003M6-FF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrqF-000326-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrhw-0001wm-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrhq-0001qH-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrhq-0000Uq-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35860.15610165091889 (code B ref 35860); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2019 07:41:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47784 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrhc-0000UP-Ro for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:57675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdrhb-0000U9-3A for 35860@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:41:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1561016495; bh=LnYMm/uHtaJ4+e6wLikZv/L1I3S8lGQo91A+cP7l+t8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hvMGcsZpMmSDsUVi3kHK1SFMshwLIg6g65AAkSn17P7W8k+Kl/je69txNWLqI4ms9 uawSX6fw+hgKpFEdI8phPuuvNkJGg4+yrglfx9yCRUrEgv+kLqHmTR8v0zOzbSTTNF y3OuUbJwyA9Lco+bIRRmMhPlrY9gLKsFnuURLA5s= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.73.215]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MMGRA-1hw5bU3buw-00JKfs; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:41:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a7edxmup.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:J1Elry+Ir5o5p2ZGXj869ww72Ggowxzn8HtiKW4l1Ta1nYpfWGO qvu9WFfUSYW4/lrO4XDJxzj05pdqx7U7/rIjOcuM5xAlmfcu4vDXxyNK7PR8OS4GKOS9ph3 08NlcwQv+6qJ3Qos9k+c5L7wJtwZkMHpK/u7pmYCfsRny/1gaQ4gSQ9afprwnXh6excjhpA RQgnnXdl6/vp6E4191M8A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:20L4TADCpIE=:LHl897e3y6gn0sJeP/dvYU kIQ7qLABRaF4FVRMEwjvzu4Ld8ADZSsUZurKmjTTBP/c8bvqvw5TdTvtY7ndRdtK8FySmGVSj S+WRepkw+ISTb+NgDIWccGtLckLIkjGCYaR5n9YZkhiYJ1KZwXcGIF9qWcdxgWzIEGuVlOFEj eHYYl7sYHRZP7VJAEP8GefdsUNW6IZHbzBrhwyeVbm49zK3EX1BsegF88JdmC8L7ShRF9nFHJ pH0rdxtH1CrsLubqUajy4s5cT0g/A2amH9osygfAlT6YYtiRsZHIOaq+0aLnWTyTltNfiBlNS msIHiuR92NZXwuEEroK8EK2fBgZEBWCTvsmmTvKu8ZL5OPvtnw+e3+HuRDT881heff52ww/KC /Bz5ZuRkiMuWSVWxDoEMtVC+Ar2JnCpUqBZNFJBkBC3dHa1VfPZDLccbQ7w8Yo6NquxSKtxR1 WszXBb/iFu8XM+Bs5p6ZIei5ffioVsLQwwGUN2bCkk6V5YBZPCFBVoFmE04MJxEbFzQj+FBJ7 ac27NcS7IXMYaJSMifYGewEcehWxizUSHcYRUKCfk2RXrwTr0MRYvqltRFbzrYeQv6nqCdE/3 32vgWm7mdWJshaMNarIutkRsDVjzirwRUqHYFzyNSoD3+XM631r8BlrmUfY0PgdazkXbygKqN 2BpG8b1U5Of7IrIgc2dC08/CikZ4TiurRFI9h3jaE3mZUC99lmJVjw3UB/wvDFSm7Xp+GWhZQ 2cqh9NkaznrhaGYonN7WUsLgFMLKOxlEETxNOMniezAmDyzT+IrO4hDTUSIQ1TG9b2FFovXy X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160879 Archived-At: > BTW, we had plans to rename 'window--display-buffer'. > But shouldn't it rather use 'display-buffer-' prefix? > Maybe, 'display-buffer-in-window'? Back in January I wrote ... > The cleanup has been done. The final message of that subthread says: > > Anyone interested in renaming 'window--display-buffer' - please go > ahead. I think a 'display-buffer-' prefix should then be appropriate. > > What I meant there is that calling it say 'display-buffer-in-window' > would be appropriate but the final name is up to its clients. ... so feel free to do that. BTW, doesn't your earlier remark ... > We could support an action alist too in addition to buffer-local variables, > but we should leave an ability to set buffer-local variables, because > neither view-lossage nor vc-git-print-log (two primary cases to test > this feature) have no access to the 'action' arg of display-buffer. ... miss one aspect: 'display-buffer-overriding-action' can always be used to set and/or override any 'window-point' or 'window-start' alist entries. martin