From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47599: [External] : bug#47599: 28.0.50; Feature request improve/update isearch Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 22:43:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210405020725.ob7bewlin7cid4pa.ref@Ergus> <20210405020725.ob7bewlin7cid4pa@Ergus> <87mtubrzp3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Ergus , 47599-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 07 00:44:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQd-0008r6-Pf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:44:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQc-00087n-Rh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQU-00087Z-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQU-0005e3-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQU-00010E-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 22:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47599 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47599-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D47599.16177490313825 (code D ref 47599); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 22:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47599-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2021 22:43:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42255 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQJ-0000zd-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:43:51 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:56088) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lTuQI-0000zU-0C for 47599-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 18:43:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1617749028; bh=7kPVzETEvjbIENjaDa5PqI/Hs6Z8jDwkE1IabSpFb8Q=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=adiVOqxSru9gpiME/xpOK0zkh8XAEgM7wVusyYhvsHJZoVNhDoj0aR9tInRMqztn3 Pz0oqO13QWO979tt4WT8mkd1FUON0Iz+VtGa8BEX8Xrud31hg6zTbRhLeugUHkdNFM xxr/9VY3RJiOpXe7AMnj7TkqsU34CG/P1IYKbZ5/ezQYXvrDCqedtnmpTQYMBe7kk7 vkKnI3HnnEvHUZJtn9m6YT6dnf2UZbR3KWEOIXN7UQ5Z/o6Di/iup4abLo7jrfM0/E 7GMHnBJXKx2IN4RdiwuLOouN7VojDBUUEQYRNcFWnTEAV3xn44/l4E5hnMGFRhfZWP rU1jfSI+hGlcQ== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203659 Archived-At: >> While we're improving isearch, there is another minor change that I >> think would improve its behavior, namely to go to the next/previous >> match when changing the search direction, instead of hitting the same >> match before moving to the next/previous one with the next C-s/C-r. >> This change is so small that I'm not sure it's worth creating a >> defcustom for it, but you might have a different opinion. > > Please do NOT do this. There are reasons we want to stay at the same > search hit. > Okay, so I have the answer to my own question: this should become yet another user option. > > One of them has already surfaced in these (lamentable) discussions of > isearch "improvements": > Why "lamentable"???