From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57669: 29.0.50; C-n, C-p off under long lines Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:19:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87y1uujufi.fsf@dick> <83k06effg6.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu5ijcqg.fsf@dick> <2e25ca87e3d9ee13ba3e@heytings.org> <87illxka46.fsf@dick> <8335d1dr39.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtb8hezl.fsf@dick> <838rmsd4cc.fsf@gnu.org> <878rmsh9me.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29994"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 57669@debbugs.gnu.org To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 09 17:20:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnf-0007WN-F0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 17:20:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnd-0003Ah-U5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:20:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnW-0003AH-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnW-0003iO-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnV-0003Sl-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57669-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57669.166273678013277 (code B ref 57669); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2022 15:19:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfnA-0003S5-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:19:40 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:33858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWfn8-0003Rw-1l for 57669@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:19:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1662736777; bh=4DN3XLpUALXemy4Hvoo8m52YQAvwEidz/9MXg5Z5kQA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=zqnPwfJoaxTREHiVZ8h6MN9S5qZdtSi+H1fJQ+4Soaf6oqq2s/FP/22nZxTT1XQmU yenAEP2reqtfD7J60D0+Au37FEjPLFCIFZ2s8TwdJKZ8t7Y2wOtOd52gchhtzQ5Ruu r6vablgU1M0+0eYM32E0Ue+lKzKe8gy8UqxyV2woaRT3uT2Bpg/+axeg+6Sl7TL3gL B6dbuX87Xc1CefxZ1RQWaYR3pwWJlG20fsLcesi/kjLWhsD0ZmLwFqn27xSBzCdu7c G8Bdsq7oar5KRxLw6lvu92zsAy7iDlyfDxudwr58HrV7WXEwWxuszG+U5h2ZPUO3sd e7ic/bMXcr0mg== In-Reply-To: <878rmsh9me.fsf@dick> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241989 Archived-At: > > The Commercial Emacs long lines fix *preceded* GNU's by about six months > (and I might add, did so without resorting to the blunt instrument of > narrowing). > As I told you yesterday (privately), Commercial Emacs performs much worse than what is now on master with respect to that bug. > > The proposer of the GNU Emacs fix even paraphrased Commercial Emacs > ??? I did not even know that a proposed fix existed in "Commercial Emacs". And how could your proposed fix have been an inspiration in any way? As you yourself write two lines above you "do not resort to the blunt instrument of narrowing". > > To be clear, I'm not aggrieved. > To be clear, you seem to be.