From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49869: Revert buffer? Yes/No/Maybe Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:37:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87im0la99d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pmutl8iv.fsf@gnu.org> <83im0ll7oi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32836"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, 49869@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 14:38:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9y-0008Jq-Sw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:38:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9x-0005wV-7x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9r-0005wM-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9q-0002yw-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9q-0003Rx-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49869.162808066613224 (code B ref 49869); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 12:37:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9a-0003RE-2T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:35412) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBG9Y-0003R6-L2 for 49869@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 08:37:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1628080663; bh=wOYGf20KUVMcWsQHlaZAy6qiZl4XzHjldIi+rpEUinA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=iUADksZO4YPmz0s7sY9H+qQbR3F1XKC2XEFQUEsz3tGE2HUByrrEM1w/fag4ZebId SicjMB/lwpxUpuxjylmGWMwoGi4+abc3TX5SWlNHdrQaPxZC3Ro5o32PN3oXyXpcL3 hoLJ3zO8LZjTzqG8p8DHHlAhHWq8exS0M6AO8a/a8vnmkXs1+gtBCmvZNo3iB1y9lO +M47POdYcYak22M+0MNJoQpAqd2KBpFlF8JDSKMl0pC1DA1PRWM2ET577XYuc3kkzD ynMxYz+QQNBDiF/UfwZ2KvQy2e7jazjsNZ3Ddzr8zUpn6Z3VwLlgyx6+RW5DyP5lDr JVzpk7LVuRr+w== In-Reply-To: <83im0ll7oi.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211172 Archived-At: >> (defun revert-buffer-short-answer (&optional args) >> (interactive (list (not current-prefix-arg))) >> (let ((use-short-answers t)) >> (revert-buffer args))) >> >> (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x g") 'revert-buffer-short-answer) > > If you propose this as something people who want this could do in their > init files, then I agree. > No, I propose this as a solution to Juri's problem, instead of his proposed solution to "revert the buffer immediately" with C-x x g, which is indeed too drastic. Something even better to take Lars' suggestion (do not ask confirmation when the buffer has not been modified) into account: (defun revert-buffer-short-answer (&optional ignore-auto noconfirm preserve-modes) (interactive (list (not current-prefix-arg))) (let ((use-short-answers t) (noconfirm (not (buffer-modified-p)))) (revert-buffer ignore-auto noconfirm preserve-modes)))