From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47012: xref copies keymap properties to minibuffer Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 19:10:59 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87czw9tnu9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3aad442a-7319-5db5-2fc6-560bb032c34d@yandex.ru> <87a6r9v24b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sg4kb839.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rc3bls6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871rc2ly7x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4228b128-039c-2bcd-002c-5ac830d7a4d3@yandex.ru> <87pmzgtr80.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <186b46fa-3716-a76d-db85-09638d7805c7@yandex.ru> <8335wbiaaj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20523"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: 47012@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 18:15:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdVc-0005Dv-SA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:15:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdVa-0004Wk-Hg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdRq-0000BG-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdRq-0007uN-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdRq-00017j-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47012.16172070704248 (code B ref 47012); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 16:11:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdQz-00016S-VU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:44726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRdQx-00016F-Uz for 47012@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id e14so30850042ejz.11 for <47012@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F6W3mGZ8n5sGq28XmPIvM9GmFs2E+xO5gzLwW1wpWN0=; b=fJt4U5Z/Tb7nT9v+EHoEdM48KW5IKdeynwKaZQr3XbqM3NcTXi3Dk5Ykh/Aow9MBr2 SzsJwCYarCWEaG4/WmYweLl9bWomhs5OP4KR5TPUXAQYb5FFmsIupnfRfB6f4Z1gb7RK 4XRm2cafWJTgs4OQEjTAYgml+7jnQkI/8tuABOUS/7x1sYcyDONTd1RnOLdDXTb4BWGD L0Vbr1MQnmwRiOuhfZxNvYqb036rLenoL7Ub5HHXGIp/aESCHuxb9Uu5APqHZrGKjuIP pJVTeI6JclCbqW5WrZfvZHKD1monNul5kYv37brQirme44PC/6/7KNGZ8SYUixMlsORr RvZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F6W3mGZ8n5sGq28XmPIvM9GmFs2E+xO5gzLwW1wpWN0=; b=dtKSCx+RR1ZS/3Kf+7KahwdxjL7dAX2igBLLpFzah4LUe7o/nPPTc/OSpLjjQq3+4N 2nQ2nHTvXLaPH56h9ppb5dWkyg+q4KV6FmHmjmwIYTkIMXde9ZrVjP9w6XPOA59PKLYZ KaZW0ZpQRu4MQ2wRJhGv1FOGO8Y63gBCaGWqT5KV9gmJh8AlIbOitnSpYs49ZJ6EKMoQ ccEhnSLI6uJZP8mjMOlPajlsJTjKaLaSCRuNJfUDctJdTljhbD0guJY00KXr0xvY/+Yb lQ4o8vmSlllmDEVuvzd1IzYxr1gpqPPu8rWKdUqQz/gpMNQRslBruYvsol8DaTMc1LN4 jwJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53028xPBnacJRLeMwRKdinPPqj+6kX+ZiH6ToMrayejnm95uAbNs iQ/PbZmyDK30hIWx9Iu13YU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxRF7haE8tx+VpgOA+3k76jUUvbQ0/AqzK0kNRRd9PBKBikWTld3PKB7LWCUh4mmmWXi5w2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ad4:: with SMTP id z20mr4245843ejf.496.1617207062091; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm1451866eje.120.2021.03.31.09.11.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:11:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335wbiaaj.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203373 Archived-At: On 31.03.2021 18:59, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > As we all know, faces can be customized. If some attributes are > "magic", in that the display will be hard to read if those attributes' > values are changed, then I think we should document that in the > respective doc strings. I'm not sure what you're saying we should or shouldn't do. Juri's concern is that the default look lacks emphasis. It might be okay to alter it, though I'd like to avoid too radical changes. The comment about making text harder to read that I made can apply to almost every face: adding darker background to a face where foreground is dark reduces perceived contrast, which makes text harder to real. Sometimes it's okay, but in general it's better to look for other options first rather than be forced to balance emphasis with readability.