From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 11:28:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83mtsxzund.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> <835yzjwbnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516044215.23yd5ae3yeby6kaq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83zgwvuu5z.fsf@gnu.org> <83tun3ur7h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516065904.5wweuipi23oy5g2x@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83pmxrulm4.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf8fukdu.fsf@gnu.org> <83im3jujtg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12303"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: boruch_baum@gmx.com, 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 16 11:29:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1liD5K-00035r-Nk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 11:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liD5J-00071W-Qx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liD54-00071L-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liD54-0003Wf-Br for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liD54-00037s-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 09:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.162115729011957 (code B ref 48408); Sun, 16 May 2021 09:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 09:28:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liD4E-00036n-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:28:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liD4C-00036Y-Pf for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 05:28:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1621157282; bh=0t768rHwm/wF4/vEAyfiqawtbgunuqg1eyXQrweE7ks=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HH0wqxOT8wOc6EqEOOwlNSpv58A8VKSFeoyWOLESUY9gKHQLEo/TT+W3UWVLfiuPI 9O1BDa36il8FwalqdTACLRBbxtTAApo4JUd0DfGVdQZXasVNDDrleL+2eu1KBZii4e AbxfbqJ5eVOhMnS3jwjPeXptjskwBI63Dg5NPIuw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.102]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2Dx8-1lLQVw1OVK-013bne; Sun, 16 May 2021 11:28:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83im3jujtg.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cNvJYOFk4/YtgCQvntJjEhvzFAanCvpESaVCNv4I/8CyDmqfkye lRdFJ7JinenCOUDX9m0fB5+hEsLUraa5iezG0Xf2fQnx1gprss0ta5c9p1l0CbIDsiCAWqY tmJBMNmg2GJJBeEsMd2Ejk8dsumBom2STHNexc/f+t6xkohAi1HNTvtr28/goBIsTp0szks wi+9IdxP3xJg1F+5X3mtw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wKv/u1a1QJ8=:cxbVm4WVbNYUrc8NG95W5W jVkCF2VHGdk5IJJNxHxkgw7jF9NVuJ0PRrBq7Lk2Nc6ZNQr5Dt7ToLqYijbe8MRpGL9DcpVBl cS6L4aKGdUfnBVp9fHtZBwh/gcZlmWI72oRv3/wn/kZp0z5I/1J45cojH8NqawCY1Kat5dGee DwxEZPTGMWGsMsclEb7pVf7HbMM8ZKewqlR0SARufOC88yzZlgp2FH4H+SvtJGbbGlAYOzs+I aqhrVK6NLv2ulM06CoIUsJonnLArLZcErHQQFkQ7+I/FScAm2KRAPGgbAPEFVdjyWI/JZTvBN tX/qM1Tj0gEp3xKd8wyi7Kv39D3raR8sqFlkO/mlK5af9a5eSmaJ6PWVp7irjj3yvoh0336XD pF9IpxaXR6+fHmovo1KCZn10Ac9MzVKqtApkmlJ/KStloBWt17eqSFVBR2BDxJfbjQZkHjogR a04uVepz9O+i6ncxknDEc+LLx5/w/GBF4TNXuVv5smHvonCQO07+Wa0uK3ZMZUWsg+YUR4Arm XkYeQKOKsmUvCR4Ae8cvus2RDQ/z6xp0j+p6BPCmuuDr3icUD48UYUoQZ1P8v41vXUqJy9N1i HDETzptyf6fJkrpVtz4/bVgL72HlL2WZGNEnrNYHnJIiRBzApt9/sAOE2KLA3RV8Or7S/B8Ks 6DMgrf341qTP5LGjP9udymdzIlDpzD0anLujXTHNbznQpZEBofPbVyCCpuSQaO5ctkmi2Qgny 92EuiP7wJ4K8AfsmW5dGmD+yBQqvyRVOFfVKqtccOZejxn6btTTLwBmkdWQaClbEyww4GO24 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206650 Archived-At: > Actually, no, I do have an opinion on that: face-font can return a > string even on a TTY frame, at least in a build --without-x. (Which > seems to be an inconsistency in and of itself, btw.) > > In general, trusting frame parameters too much is IME not a good idea, > as they are too loosely defined. Is it possible that `window-font-width' and `window-font-height' run into a similar problem when `face-font' returns nil? martin