From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46610: Interactive mode tagging for python.el navigation functions Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878s7ly57x.fsf@gnus.org> <83czwx5tfu.fsf@gnu.org> <835z2p5s9e.fsf@gnu.org> <4419101f-a65a-6906-2cdd-d550f5f40f0a@yandex.ru> <834ki95luw.fsf@gnu.org> <253198f6-9ebb-f348-7dbe-a44d3d9281a8@yandex.ru> <83v9ap40qf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: ddavis@ddavis.io, larsi@gnus.org, 46610@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 20:59:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpSw-00096h-4l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 20:59:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpSv-0007l2-43 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpS2-000781-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpS2-0000hh-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpS2-0001dc-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46610 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46610-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46610.16136782916239 (code B ref 46610); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46610) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2021 19:58:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpR9-0001cV-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:58:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:46541) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCpR7-0001c1-SC for 46610@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:58:06 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id v22so5796803edx.13 for <46610@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:58:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXmiN0LaukT4AlBiWGpDLQKqm4fl2Lu5zQs65DYhc2w=; b=L/MZHSQDD6qgrdtSy+pNqhQ8tckK9SIGvUlyJK459JZ+Tk0KVpVKqjaOczZrDGjrq0 /z2OFalkXh8UAtVUrS1KW0XnNFar9PrLk3egSN0k0v4GdvC1SFCAmhpkC2akNGaRYQIw hvyHtnOU5oF3QALlL6R3vTqw0OJTUZ5+WUkQYE4ZqFv9mkFIaEUO5J9Roo+0j7mmsboe IDrmQSQ2dljVwXdsTZzg0Abrbydz8n1X0QOU8ZST8MNOLMkD0kn4F7Te8DJhptSmXH6X IrnO/1X3VuGvfs9RtWM9NDl+lPMXNeXtXGX4DfD991kQx5qgktswEfRi23ZlpLMJ8qz4 Dnsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXmiN0LaukT4AlBiWGpDLQKqm4fl2Lu5zQs65DYhc2w=; b=JfJcK9Xe4FPglleTAnH1ZTDIMEt/0PXprSqcH7rBXj9cfNHfgUU9xsLCm+TYwtMsn/ oHvIQDPYMBW5xOICxgXcu6Ghk1FGs55JWEc/tT/os0AdbBo0kESB3KKlOkgQuMjd9Lar Os6WAoAcIexhLGgzNIb33Fk0an4USWfqFXct8A2iwhhwCS425GsXF6UKLqn5iWpXoAP7 c+A8hku+8dLpuQZUUhxXPxYuyYnH8TZDRvs/HKcBJgcIQku02P8JGFT5LGrgzCAIMuaE X4z8LOGKetF92WkHN/8TibU679e6SM+yBBkB5aZlYmTZtxuN+/9v2XDsQWmdrae/juUs MZnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/hoaA/LgGwwB3I4HlG+zW3BnJ0FSXcBqC+17RkP5ggKQ2FkF2 q3PwBRD+HIOilXyNAqjmYvw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzW0rf3kKBSbK5iTGQtW9FUstiC5s6GpwLAuforVBU4SsZgZHeqd7V8ZPi5bSRBQX0V0OxosA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:11c7:: with SMTP id j7mr5704969edw.290.1613678279854; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:57:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ke26sm1315071ejc.69.2021.02.18.11.57.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:57:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83v9ap40qf.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200280 Archived-At: On 18.02.2021 21:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: ddavis@ddavis.io, larsi@gnus.org, 46610@debbugs.gnu.org, >> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:54:06 +0200 >> >>> My question is more of the conceptual kind, not necessarily about this >>> specific change. Your original response was also about the principle, >>> AFAIU. >> >> I guess I'm not sure what you are asking about at this point > > Let me repeat my original question: Very good. >> So packages on ELPA are allowed to be ahead of those in core, but not >> vice versa? Is that really the intent that we allow them to diverge, >> but only in one direction? > >> yes, python.el is allowed to incorporate support for some new >> features from Emacs 28, as long as they are backward-compatible, or >> gated behind a version check. > > If python.el in emacs.git is allowed to be different from that in > elpa.git (and AFAIU we already allow that), then there should be no > need for any compatibility shims in the version that is in emacs.git. Then this part of my first reply should be most pertinent: Then we (someone? who?) either have to maintain both versions Emphasis on "who".