(Spun out from bug#66706. My previous message below.)

On 10/25/2023 8:48 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
 > On 10/25/2023 6:19 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
 >> I'll start with a patch here then. I think this is also a prime spot
 >> to add an example or two that would actually show lexical binding in
 >> action (i.e. a sample where the code would do something different
 >> under dynamic binding).
 >
 > Here's a first attempt. I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with it (the
 > digression into setting 'lexical-binding' to 't' is a bit disruptive),
 > but hopefully it's an improvement. Of course, we can keep adjusting this
 > further as needed.