From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Ralf Fassel <ralf@akutech.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: `print' does not print
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:31:46 +0200
Organization: Akustik Technologie Goettingen
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <a96nji$ofv$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <15520.45112.118124.712072@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020327074336.5838B-100000@is>
	<15521.35374.659644.387438@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
	<1659-Fri12Apr2002123712+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018618290 25087 127.0.0.1 (12 Apr 2002 13:31:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:31:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drk@sgi.com, rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16w19G-0006WW-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:31:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16w0aR-0005r3-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:55:31 -0400
Original-Received: from delysid.gnu.org ([158.121.106.20])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16w0Xv-0005UZ-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:52:55 -0400
Original-Received: from mail.t-intra.de ([62.156.146.210])
	by delysid.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2)
	id 16vzRY-00061c-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:42:16 -0400
Original-Received: from jupiter.akutech-local.de ([217.226.219.16]) by mail.t-intra.de  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.507.50);
	 Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:31:54 +0200
Original-Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by jupiter.akutech-local.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id g3CBVkP159310;
	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:31:46 +0200 (MDT)
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <1659-Fri12Apr2002123712+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:605
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:605

* Eli Zaretskii
| It is my impression that removing the SGI-specific treatment of the
| `.got' sections from unexelf.c is a good idea, but I'm unsure
| whether it will have adverse effects on some (older?)  versions of
| the SGI development tools, and if so whether saying in etc/MACHINES
| that users should upgrade to newer devo is good enough.

Since we do not seem to be able to recreate the exact conditions to
check why these were necessary (David?), and since an OS upgrade (Good
Thing [TM] anyway) solves the issue I have brought up, I think adding
advice to etc/MACHINES is enough.

R'