From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34763: 27.0.50; url-retrieve-synchronously misbehaves inside eldoc-documentation-function Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:07:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83a7i15vrk.fsf@gnu.org> <787f765a-42f4-40d0-3b78-e751f546fe6c@yandex.ru> <831s3c3ta8.fsf@gnu.org> <8f7ae869-2e94-5535-f16f-476348036dc2@yandex.ru> <83r2bc2csd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8c63ek1.fsf@gnu.org> <26aa8637-18db-2551-bff8-41276f22732b@yandex.ru> <83r2b8ywam.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="228251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Cc: 34763@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 15 17:08:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNc-000xGD-FI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:08:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58098 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNb-0004Mt-CU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNM-0004KN-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNL-0004BU-9H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNK-0004B6-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pNK-0007Ft-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34763 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34763-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34763.155266604327832 (code B ref 34763); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34763) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Mar 2019 16:07:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pMh-0007Eq-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51]:56024) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h4pMf-0007Ed-MW for 34763@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 4so6997265wmf.5 for <34763@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:07:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XqrP8zTWue9Ttor37kmvK9BQktzulT7BargkuTzkkbc=; b=V6w/LPITrs3nLlwmBRdjMfB5qgttHcIRnJpsdFVObBSCaAylmQccXuP3djoWIaJMm9 A+3n2bCnXT6xL2ppGGdlIpR7/SrPmNUTInU/+KfJQmHs5MNTr2mbjjNwnHjSKYCd5Nag gWM+9dELT/K57mr697cO7uSMrc6MsWf8ElMOT4T/FDQJWUJvGFH1xs6NXfi0BlyqBNcn gRVrno/h4i1faUWjqS+guWKak68WQIyRQCpnx5zLBbvsuktIOlHLV+EEHWz8W6td15b2 VO+4oXzsTSMBLIiXiN1yV/98Jo+xKJ6nj9D/lpfWx+s4OMmBhh/XTUCg04dD5WrtKoSx l1QA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XqrP8zTWue9Ttor37kmvK9BQktzulT7BargkuTzkkbc=; b=IwCmDZv28meCuOcqf1fsLLgSXIpAsV2RE7lScvNfsSfQA6hotKSkjUyepwMemeppwv DslDN2T32JjG6ebxRmCKAQoKgrSjuu17M75mi3OIsq3c5AQNQxwvZAjSj3zwoGfoxFUG j/gR7vOz649gyQXf9wTqvAF/JAwsPE4QmvCFEfggAj0BZPGO6kQYagGpJeYKEYZq7WTN YirMu0MbemiaiycP6WncI1tjXoYmTRwHJaI7+yeNGWxBuX5XxHlrmCgrDejmG9mLItk1 v8SDq7uZWuqysvaDxFl0XiHZlqEBigntL9BQsjhuSRUWKtcuIzdmqWYvt04snnanh2hk rbvg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAhnEmWbGbDVhGJalpsGJReBs4r9Qz3ivLkHpc/tPHejAv+rXl ALboBECdlTx3aKh1K9FvMORCD2xt X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXsWZQvqD4Uou3NF3noI3YpO3+mC8s+732HtOUeCOjw/WRl+erBWTj8MyfuKRl4+DA4wKmVw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:230e:: with SMTP id j14mr2817875wmj.9.1552666035454; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a8sm3185382wmh.26.2019.03.15.09.07.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:07:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r2b8ywam.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156391 Archived-At: On 15.03.2019 17:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 34763@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:24:44 +0200 >> >> Sounds like an external library problem, maybe? > > GnuTLS? Except the requests only use HTTP, not HTTPS. So... IDK? > So it sounds like quitting in the middle of a URL retrieval leaves > some leftovers that get in the way of additional retrieval attempts. Maybe so. >> BUT! I have tried to reproduce this slowdown behavior with a local >> server, and so far no luck. Ping to Google (or almost any other website) >> is 100ms from my current location, so maybe it makes a difference. > > Maybe with a local server you aren't fast enough to interrupt the > transfer before it completes? I do manage to trigger the "Transfer interrupted" errors, though. So maybe not. Or not exactly.