From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47431: Process Whois connection broken by remote peer. Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:19:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: <835z1dp0qg.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e9nhne.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgynp9t5.fsf@gnus.org> <406246af7fb57420287b@heytings.org> <87ft0ens4h.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18451"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47431@debbugs.gnu.org, hongyi.zhao@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 29 14:20:49 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqsy-0004il-G0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:20:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqsx-0001WP-DP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqsG-0001UK-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqsF-0007CQ-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqsE-00059O-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47431.161702039119777 (code B ref 47431); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 12:19:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqs2-00058v-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:46012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQqs1-00058n-M5 for 47431@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 08:19:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1617020388; bh=eq12+8oKELL6ZLH6OI8IQ/pOw3r/PDIZyqVrGJ9YnHA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=umEvsZ1zjhLMeYzMCEIUAgmEXizv7TZPqtg3SRdWrQ/f7b5/zEeZMf+e+B95N4Pup i/0KtwYt15jz+qkyWzJehCm80bNo72jHExWO/nn8QTcy0ZxiTPg0FjHhivTdqJF0sL DmISWtFbSRcacNRvUOzpnu72/K2sgh4nwBtB3+RXPvqkTweIBvVzHFikYxvZhCDNE8 DjDpoWlJrgJ3WkGLFJv7+hCxXBT20Jx5RYdyuvkx/KmREXYK1eDa3baPNCSylQrzVt vnRV/fn3r1pRrJHI2680W016qplOx4Li0Dohs4La34gPxLVqjUUDArpfNRU1+F8n+B tNou7Il3nxqHg== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203236 Archived-At: >>> IOW, without a built-in list, each whois query would create two >>> requests, one to whois.iana.org, and one to the actual whois server. >> >> That's fine. The only issue here is whether whois.iana.org is designed >> for this kind of use -- if not, it might be abusive of Emacs to do >> this, and we should indeed keep the server list updated in Emacs. > > As far as I can see, whois.iana.org is indeed designed for this kind of > use, and the GNU/Linux whois command even has an option to do this (-I). > But I'm not 100% sure. Do you think it's better if I first check this > with IANA? > I've just sent a mail to IANA to clarify that point.