From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17862: 24.3; regexp-opt docstring is incorrect Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:41:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404229336 11527 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2014 15:42:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17862@debbugs.gnu.org, immerrr again To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 01 17:42:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C8-00071u-TO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:42:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C8-0008My-DX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C4-0008MX-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C2-0005aF-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C2-0005aB-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X20C1-00083I-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17862 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17862-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17862.140422928030898 (code B ref 17862); Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17862) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2014 15:41:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X20BM-00082H-5C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:44848 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X20BJ-000828-Kh for 17862@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X20BH-0007ZC-Rj; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:41:16 -0400 X-Spook: Operation Iraqi Freedom CIA Bletchley Park 9705 Samford X-Ran: +CZ%}nh9Gr9&oJjADt@s;,}%}ccv?ZD!`gmA?-ob*&0B?YyKN\nFILd)V]-5|/GRl3-j-p X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:16:45 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91048 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > (regexp-opt '("ab" "ac") "\\(?:") => "\\(?:a[bc]\\)" If that is all, it's no longer needed, since that is the default, as this report says. I suppose you could use it to add an explicit group number. Is it worth it?