From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45474: Icomplete exhibiting in recursive minibuffer when it =?UTF-8?Q?shouldn=E2=80=99t?= Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 08:40:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87lf9cepqw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7ee648e8400708d266ed@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8356"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dario Gjorgjevski , 45474@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 10:54:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldULw-000215-Ls for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 10:54:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53306 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldULv-00045b-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:54:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldU8U-0006ML-9c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldU8U-0002k6-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldU8T-0005OY-Tl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:41:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 08:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45474 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45474-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45474.162003124320715 (code B ref 45474); Mon, 03 May 2021 08:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45474) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 08:40:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldU8B-0005O3-7z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:35258) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldU89-0005Nx-Fy for 45474@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 04:40:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1620031239; bh=aAVfFBWmDti80BekypsONcXn3FIC9W1m+pDvCbLL40Q=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=Oe49dUAxpZYhU33isatpS0cjSiT5GwRDQKzULrSqUlVUEhBrp7nMBy92L4yomA07v SzeFjlXruTHQoL23IwvntvFXDZU4WLxNHkx1zVCxZg+sgvxs5UlUuWS90x9chcRn2t 3OX1hfPzyUK88CmFkdlI4ETJ1FHuKcsFMDfPoBJp5hcxUCWvCVN+YPr8XF/6/fk5xb u/jGtNxsOvbf1zoxDevjSWGjGD5gKJIsX++Y4COP/Ri63NiLGbW9xiBN9y6sUbenv1 G7oS4QYrq6yjUkcVekMmT+HXhrC4vnWFl6nkJFDThClgzoN+AArBiry2vpgql8nwne 9RBScWFp/nK1A== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205481 Archived-At: > > OK, seeing how noone reported problems with my patch, I pushed it to > `master`. In case someone later reports a problem, we may "revert" to > your approach if its slightly better compatibility proves useful. > Okay, I guess the best thing to do now is to just let it go. The main point of my approach was not a better compatibility, but to fix that problem in a more general way that would have cleaned up the situation in a longer term.