From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:56:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <838rgvymcd.fsf@gnu.org> <831qmkwmux.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz64v3v7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 61514@debbugs.gnu.org, mah@everybody.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 16:57:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8XN-0008aR-Jg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:57:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8XI-00019n-8R; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8XG-00019e-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8XG-0004gK-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8XF-0003bq-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.167690859613841 (code B ref 61514); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2023 15:56:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53305 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8Wq-0003bB-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:56:36 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:37160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pU8Wm-0003av-4e for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 10:56:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676908590; bh=K0l/+hAmNtZthiGiEcWwMMfcEspxd8jMVQ4MSmFRWpw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=t5QgD7uyt09Q9Zk4LQAowUPcJGae0z76bSy3WQeceZkptGshumG3UmRXQPpDaStva 1dtZdbCRPLfTDmCNSY+ZXOYQAQK8qFk9Mp1pMKmOEIHD3NpxfiVY27tIvPP3OBQkhu xaC2Ewq4C8ZlhMPlSnxyRVWA6WK5SjrloMCc9QB+0KLtThrwtFQg+GYh/fLE4T0hvU lGsCVUFR7awvXp7V/9PTSAgPc9hfSomzDjgtVnnesJo3+PI+83aZGof7/k5SFTovYS xiX1jpwEycjal3ZXnAJts4Kqy+KeLSG5gIivRZ5n1iOh33itwrapsedks4e81MEVgG nXM8h4Wp71N1A== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256196 Archived-At: > > What am I missing? > I don't know... but I observe that this alone: (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "*bug*") (insert "\n]+?\\(\\(?:\\(xmlns\\)\\|[_[:alpha:]][-._[:alnum:]]*\\)\\(:[_[:alpha:]][-._[:alnum:]]*\\)?\\)[ \r\t\n]*=\\(?:[ \r\t\n]*\\('[^<'&\r\n\t]*\\([&\r\n\t][^<']*\\)?'\\|\"[^<\"&\r\n\t]*\\([&\r\n\t][^<\"]*\\)?\"\\)\\(?:\\([ \r\t\n]*>\\)\\|\\(?:\\([ \r\t\n]*/\\)\\(>\\)?\\)\\|\\([ \r\t\n]+\\)\\)\\)?")) doesn't fail, so I don't think it's this regexp which causes the overflow.