From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:11:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <838rgvymcd.fsf@gnu.org> <831qmkwmux.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz64v3v7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37325"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 61514@debbugs.gnu.org, mah@everybody.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 20:12:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBaN-0009XM-1T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 20:12:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBaB-0008P6-CK; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBZy-0008F4-Re for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBZx-0002Fh-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:12:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBZx-0002y1-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.167692029611367 (code B ref 61514); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 19:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2023 19:11:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53670 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBZX-0002xH-SR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:37410) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUBZV-0002x8-QS for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:11:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676920292; bh=kwk21LumS7moeFkfOwRUWFptgi0D+z01ajINZnW6Hh4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=pTfPPzeGc5RgNtCg3W/bxdEFqKhd4wuPRFXbjXZHkh8K8BwA4jQCvrdGo6axpgxIq d9kn4ts2y2n4l4IrCoGHgIhTKeZaIsbZvX0iZPcrtvTZugW3estnleKKQOS+apmSHT BO+DKcSdYfb9pt03s3G11LLP+weADtcq/TyZp76X+GyCsV1PJf46QDc9iwB/bxOtpi MzriA7zCoNXNw9lx/OLlKYcbhwuuEkB6s/MIAMPjYr9MIM+cs6/WJZ6ZTLODaoSqnb N4OCjyU7zU1BqJ4+HE9STtBy7HwC/dhYcZ0k/7QDl5+VLC+AkIXbG+lkaNl5+nTFAR 7c8TDhhGaWc6Q== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256213 Archived-At: > > The patch below fixes the stack overflow. > Together with the "\\<" in xmltok.el, this fixes this bug indeed in all cases (truncated and non-truncated ones). Congrats! > > I don't think we want that for `emacs-29`, but unless there's some > objection I'll push this to `master`, > I'd say it fixes an important bug in the regexp engine, but I cannot judge whether it's important enough for emacs-29.