From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:14:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <838rgvymcd.fsf@gnu.org> <886c06e50e9cfacb7954@heytings.org> <83h6vixik1.fsf@gnu.org> <886c06e50e707ab83560@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mah@everybody.org, 61514@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 01:15:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpu-0002eS-4m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 01:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpg-0007Jo-Ge; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpe-0007JK-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpe-0002aZ-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpe-0003mB-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.167685207714468 (code B ref 61514); Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2023 00:14:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpF-0003lI-2p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:36220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTtpD-0003lA-Tt for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 19:14:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676852075; bh=PhoGFvQpZB931uFzrv0IQXizza4W29got9FtMsnV2I0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=fNbaluUSYh53LQM9S5Kks5JnACy1KiGHjtH/coRkmxWkacW2S4GhW+bUt9n8YIqRU UTNvGGNSC1hE4Eis3cU1rkQ9+dZgIKPCCrIKIVDAa5ZXCnQpL5RAYF2Ey+MnzPJLs/ bVDUfy2N/cY+Uz3JiUMYLJLdZ8CO5U59vQTTA3gpxJbcmV6ACIh5xBsS+KmvC/2Il9 lTXH7gaZYwgUJHPYyRstHr3QVYk6DDHcpLg2znkOZ6CZjTaDgQ07nIsydN+pWYgeXF Ln6AwXq3sK3A9hsH8dh884DEhIw/iN0btXtZ4hLB+dgyUNX5LVkad08Hv1KgQDrYQ6 leU+4f+xCz+gg== In-Reply-To: <886c06e50e707ab83560@heytings.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256122 Archived-At: > > In a sense it is better to fail earlier, but to do that in all cases, we > would have to lower emacs_re_max_failures say to 10000, which I guess > wouldn't be good because the it would fail too much. > Out of curiosity, I just bootstrapped Emacs with emacs_re_max_failures = 10000. make and make check succeed, except one test: regex-repeat-limit. With emacs_re_max_failures = 19661 or higher that test succeeds. I don't know how important it is to allow x\\{65535\\}.