From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32747: 26; `C-M-w M-w' with non-nil `mouse-drag-copy-region', if selected with mouse Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:59:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <<<<<>>>>> <<<<<<83tvmlew2a.fsf@gnu.org>>>>>> <<<<<932a1915-c043-4708-9f16-dc0ee8fafdb3@default>>>>> <<<<<83pnx9een5.fsf@gnu.org>>>>> <<<<01b0f0c4-e3b8-440f-a739-5995ca4ff615@default>>>> <<<<83o9cte392.fsf@gnu.org>>>> <<<9136cccc-7e97-4a74-89a9-00eccab73c32@default>>> <<<4394ff48-2444-4a9b-b635-e96e66a30cba@default>>> <<<83a7obexed.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<1254fccb-35ae-4c51-8471-e01844f64517@default>> <<834lejevn7.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537477093 30083 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2018 20:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 32747@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 20 22:58:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g361V-0007fp-TX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:58:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52814 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g363c-00063G-5m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:00:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g363W-00061q-5c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g363Q-0007xz-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g363O-0007pG-31 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g363N-0002nV-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:00:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32747 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32747-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32747.153747715810666 (code B ref 32747); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2018 20:59:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g362f-0002ly-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 16:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:43460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g362d-0002ll-NC for 32747@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 16:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8KKrxh2073374; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:59:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=ltKQaocSz0rP5TyUsYHa3SBBH9MXUv+rSW5EhQ4Nk9c=; b=lLuCSkzlm/WCR9qtQ9tMtTWaz5fg8Ixxah29jslvxqYrSyNToKNYaotbE5r5w0PachyD U7kR9uuNVe9l06zng3gwReZ5kqO60hrgUr1hK271inOnJGs9/G+xQQjxMuiwbD02Yvns /ZNn7ep2r0TBGeD2O1p/DwQV+Wg8MzmACwC3pZqh1LJxUOlAa5R6N6Z6V3A6kxIjt4Og N6nA1HCslPw9b0z/MOEnHswLIp2DBPzp1Mga18xmTErnqZArQJ4YqalclSqjSn1lcfWn qxKR4qW6MkS3KnaQ4dMtyQeZX2cgJ/PtDBLvXlCiZE7LQNAjGcA3Cxp2lOwR7cZuajy/ Dg== Original-Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2mgsgu582u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:59:09 +0000 Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8KKx8kA011484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:59:08 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w8KKx8sA011646; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 20:59:08 GMT In-Reply-To: <<834lejevn7.fsf@gnu.org>> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4735.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9022 signatures=668707 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=370 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809200203 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150496 Archived-At: > > > I don't understand why you address this to me although it's clear tha= t > > > I didn't retitle this bug. > > > > I replied to the last msg I got from this thread; sorry. >=20 > In which I said nothing about retitling. So in what sense is this a > "reply"? Didn't know how to reply to the control action of retitling. Again, sorry for bothering you.