From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65116: 29.1; query-replace-read-args fails reading second arg in detached minibuf Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 21:35:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <831qalivwr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii , Jim Rees , "65116@debbugs.gnu.org" <65116@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 13 22:36:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlg6-0006v4-6k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:36:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlfi-0006uL-6v; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlff-0006ts-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlff-0005Mv-Jt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlfe-0005lm-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 21:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65116 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65116-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65116.170518175822166 (code B ref 65116); Sat, 13 Jan 2024 21:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65116) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2024 21:35:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41267 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlfa-0005lS-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:35:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:49536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOlfY-0005lC-R9 for 65116@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 16:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 66712 invoked by uid 3782); 13 Jan 2024 22:35:51 +0100 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15740.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.87.64]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:35:51 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 1803 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Jan 2024 21:35:50 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278162 Archived-At: Hello, Drew. On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 21:19:36 +0000, Drew Adams wrote: > > > > Could it have something to do with the mouse warping? Why is the mouse > > > > warping at all? I would prefer it stay right where it is. I'm pretty > > sure > > > > it did at some recent time in the past, maybe emacs 26. > > > ...Yes, I hear a distant bell ringing... > > > (Stuck on Emacs 26...) > > Could you possibly try my patch for this bug on an Emacs more recent > > than 26, and see if it helps at all with the things that have not been > > right w.r.t. minibuffers and the like? > No; sorry Alan, I can't. I don't build Emacs, > I'm on MS Windows. And too many things have > changed since Emacs 26. I've given up trying > to figure out focus problems etc. I've not. > Maybe someone at some point will report a > problem, giving a specific, operational recipe, > and maybe that'll get fixed, ..... That's precisely what's just happened, or will have happened if the OP's testing shows the expected OK. > ..... and maybe that fix will help me with the problems I encounter. Maybe. Who knows? -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).