From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65116: 29.1; query-replace-read-args fails reading second arg in detached minibuf Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:25:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83jzu6onfm.fsf@gnu.org> <835xzykbhe.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Jim Rees , 65116@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 12 16:26:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJQI-0004Cl-Ns for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:26:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJQ6-0005jE-7l; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJQ4-0005i6-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJQ4-0006QZ-6S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJQ2-0001vw-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65116 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65116-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65116.17050731437403 (code B ref 65116); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65116) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2024 15:25:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJPj-0001vL-D1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:57998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOJPh-0001v8-9k for 65116@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:25:42 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 9060 invoked by uid 3782); 12 Jan 2024 16:25:37 +0100 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe152a6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.82.166]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 16:25:37 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 10172 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jan 2024 15:25:36 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <835xzykbhe.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278039 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 14:00:29 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:26:10 -0600 > > From: Jim Rees > > Cc: 65116@debbugs.gnu.org > > The problem is in 29.1. I think report-emacs-bug just appends the info for > > whatever version of emacs you are running at the time you report a bug. > So Emacs 28 behaves correctly on your system in this scenario? > > I have tried two different window managers, twm and openbox, and get the bug > > in both of them. However, it only happens if I am running with focus follows > > mouse. It does not happen if I have set click to focus. The settings of > > focus-follows-mouse and minibuffer-follows-selected-frame make no > > difference. > Alan and Juri, could you please look into this issue? I'm looking into it now. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).