bug#64646: Master: Native compiler doesn't always compile lambda forms.

[Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>]

Hello, Andrea.

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 13:32:21 -0400, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

> > This bug doesn't seem to be moving, so ....

> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:57:01 -0400, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> >> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

> >> >> I'm not 100% convinced this behaviour is a bug tho.

> >> > I don't understand that.  Why might it be incorrect to compile that inner
> >> > lambda natively?

> >> Hi Alan,

> >> I'm not saying it would be incorrect.  I'm suggesting that if is not
> >> specified what's the expected behaviour of compiling by name the outer
> >> lambda it might not be a bug.

> >> When we compile a whole compilation unit we indeed have to compile all
> >> functions, in this case what we promised is I think not defined.

> > I still don't understand that.  The doc string for native-compile says:

> >     Compile FUNCTION-OR-FILE into native code.

> > ..  I can't see any reason not also to compile inner lambda functions
> > natively.

> > Anyhow, to fix this bug (if such it be) is easy:

> > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> > index 181e5ca96a1..2360fbaa494 100644
> > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
> > @@ -1359,7 +1359,12 @@ comp-add-func-to-ctxt
> >                (comp-ctxt-top-level-forms comp-ctxt)
> >                (list (make-byte-to-native-func-def :name function-name
> >                                                    :c-name c-name)))
> > -        (comp-add-func-to-ctxt func))))
> > +        (comp-add-func-to-ctxt func))
> > +      ;; Handle any lambda functions in BYTE-CODE.
> > +      (maphash (lambda (key val)
> > +                 (unless (eq key (aref byte-code 1))
> > +                   (comp-intern-func-in-ctxt key val)))
> > +               byte-to-native-lambdas-h)))

> >  (cl-defmethod comp-spill-lap-function ((form list))
> >    "Byte-compile FORM, spilling data from the byte compiler."


> > What do you say?

> LGTM as long as indeed it does not regress any test. Speaking of which
> with the patch I guess we want a test to cover this.

Thanks.  I've committed a patch for this, including two extra tests which
test that a nested lambda function also gets native compiled.

I'm closing the bug with this post.

> > Incidentally, the code in the various comp-spill-lap-function methods
> > together with comp-intern-func-in-ctxt appears to have some code
> > duplication.  Would it be possible to have the symbol and list methods of
> > comp-spill-lap-function simply call comp-intern-func-in-ctxt the way the
> > string method does?  That would simplify those two methods quite a bit.

> Mmmh maybe, I think one has to try to see if the result is satisfactory.

I've done this refactoring too.  The symbol and list methods for
comp-spill-lap-function now have 17 and 15 lines respectively.  I hope
you like it!

> Thanks

>   Andrea

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).