From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: daniel watson via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65973: [PATCH] ; send filename, not full path, on EWW form submit Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:15:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: daniel watson Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 65973@debbugs.gnu.org, daniel watson To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 19 11:16:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWqB-0003dr-3n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:16:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWpo-0003jh-Kn; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWpm-0003jT-9H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWpm-0007VT-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWpu-0005Ib-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: daniel watson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65973 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65973-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65973.169511493520322 (code B ref 65973); Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65973) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2023 09:15:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qiWpP-0005Hb-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [2602:fffa:fff:108a:0:16:3e15:92b8] (port=54888 helo=mailserver.each.do) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qiUxh-0001dx-66 for 65973@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 03:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ozzloy by mailserver.each.do with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qiUxW-004J1u-0s; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:15:46 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:15:29 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:270856 Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 04:47:08AM -0700, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Most (or all?) people reviewing patches use Emacs mail readers, so we > have no trouble reviewing attached files. Getting it as an attachment > actually makes things easier for us, as our tools are adapted to that > workflow. That's the main reason why we have a preference for that > format. that makes sense. i want to get my email setup like that. the inline patch was included for easier viewing in the browser and not as a replacement for the attachment, or endorsing skipping the attachment. so i'm glad you clarified on the last bug report, when i got help from people, i found myself linking to both the bug report page, and separately to another page where they could view the code in-browser. maybe the bug report page https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=65973 could display the attached patch in addition to having a download link. the source code for this page has not been touched in years though, so that makes me think it will be difficult to contribute a change. thanks for the assistance with this and the prior bug!