From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75275: 30.0.92; `make-thread` bug on macOS 15.2 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:42:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86frm1jgpq.fsf@gnu.org> <86bjwpjfle.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27292"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75275@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 02 18:44:39 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPFO-0006zm-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:44:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPF2-0000Oo-9g; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPEo-0000Nf-JZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPEo-0001Bs-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:44:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=JZuT4/GfPxWv83XCmUeqyR8jf11T/eF7SfwuXsDiayI=; b=rwa1iPwboMjL0BU576zB29K8yKj1B8oajg73x8Ub6YLcdLt0ggWbAiVdoxdaoYhXXivSt8co/oVI60HWG21ER/1AvYOHkDBkwNGwMFhh2Z3lSHEetXWVPvCMEXr1yFX3CfIiYy84zSq3G23pU7dCMkElrSJEQlcqFp+klCmWjZZqmXZwnUfQAiflCsj27dZOwmvQoMyuNgtaNBsW5gU8lp2mrk1hoUXiOzp/0Ij1AhA5EvbeDv9HSzxWPrU36tWLA3hk7LSHEqdTvXaYZ1LeXBviYQ+t8jNSt39eWGGqviBXFnA+jIXvomo3NR++7GoQ7S1tDFExu7Rv+U0zVlkb+w==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPEo-0005Y0-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75275 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 75275-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75275.173583978421239 (code B ref 75275); Thu, 02 Jan 2025 17:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75275) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2025 17:43:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPDs-0005WU-FY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from dane.soverin.net ([185.233.34.25]:58681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTPDq-0005Vg-ON for 75275@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 12:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YPDZ85MvczydL; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4YPDZ818bQzL7; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:42:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1735839776; bh=zhlSLRUpPEWG+aURbJQbs7M6CHaCu0h5teLNXnuIaNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b5a7Gqy/07+kURTTEIjWiu9AJdjP0zCIqlrLkoJALkpxY9J9gigBEytylIMVacfya rdpQoSnI/XoIWmHCFD0AiBgWivkwHYFo5gnpfvMewJJ6WxeoA21EsCISIttISIchyR PR9X8xx6HlprcSuDNTE1CQv0n7NoakgTOrvGp2M9g0gevAlW52m383ubGi9KzjZtOK 4rB72Q0KWyhz5LQoyOAqZpF2qDJprVZpelJbH5LQbYB5S1MlkZ20Yxm6LISl3cNwrH Y0AuV9BuvXCHw+O2J5zHM1Bki2CKA8G1Ad4t+89Fg5jTJixq05knoCFPAOc0GJCcwj n6200AxOQYkCw== X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfJYUb04pVGs6R3hfc68AT9HAoG+rOXRNJ34rNzqxCqBts2ktOr8MVkgqWo0bQoq/uZ4SpvPFTAIX9YFr1GMxr+BXWoRSFMRC3a5Mkug+LGnO8E5MEpyG sUZAWLqTpZuBLVYcwrFU4XbF8R8zDjaNzujQDec1361EKZiCMFx9hdsdaFDsZ0fHJZ0KZDTSXpKqyrHImxBe1Xm5oXqbwfvsbOAckctXyYbN8E/txqHwAECZ zvOS2fL3zP6FiuuBbP4NX4NdcRT/TkDeUu7vthPJsrUzWuh7aRIHy9nulknCNSD+ X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UsCZN/wB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6776d020 a=UbsBXRcqaZ6D9kgPt/Dvnw==:617 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=VdSt8ZQiCzkA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=oZsT26Yah43c72oftlYA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9MSFP0l5Dcwi9NrB_JPx:22 Original-Received: from localhost (faroe.holly.idiocy.org [local]) by faroe.holly.idiocy.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 550eb430; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 17:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= , Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com, 75275@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298208 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 06:25:46PM +0100, Gerd Möllmann wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Your change included 2 hunks, and the suggestion is to revert only > > one of them. My question is whether this is likely to reintroduce > > some regression. > > Not that I know of. It restores things to what they were before, > prevents calling NSApplication::run from being called for non main > threads, and the first hunk should still work as before. But note that > Alan thinks differently. Sorry, if Gerd's sure then I expect I'm misremembering how it worked. Please ignore me. -- Alan Third