From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58224: 29.0.50; "make bootstrap" spuriously warns: "comp.el newer than byte-compiled file" Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:37:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83r0zqahqj.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1ty1o7r.fsf@gnu.org> <83k05i1asd.fsf@gnu.org> <838rly17e9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, 58224-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 22:38:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1of5j3-0006YN-EZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 22:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47516 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of5j1-0007Uk-Q9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of5is-0007UP-GR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of5is-0007PZ-2m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1of5ir-0005RG-RF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:38:01 -0400 Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 58224 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 58224@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de, stefankangas@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 58224-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D58224.166474304420847 (code D ref 58224); Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58224-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2022 20:37:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48163 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1of5iG-0005QB-An for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mx3.muc.de ([193.149.48.5]:13401) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1of5iE-0005Py-2p for 58224-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 77072 invoked by uid 3782); 2 Oct 2022 22:37:15 +0200 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p2e5d502a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.93.80.42]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 22:37:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 8065 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Oct 2022 20:37:14 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <838rly17e9.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:244260 Archived-At: Hello, Eli and Stefan. On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 20:07:26 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 16:46:01 +0000 > > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 58224@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > > In lread.c I've got: > > > > struct timespec epoch_timespec = {(time_t)0, 0}; /* 1970-01-01T00:00 UTC */ > > > > , which clearly isn't satisfactory. > > > I'm not sure I follow: why not satisfactory? > > Don't we build for operating systems with different epochs? > No, the Epoch is the same for everyone. It's a Posix notion, AFAIK. > > > Is mktime the function you are after? > > Yes thanks! But it's horribly complicated, involving wierd readings and > > settings of the TZ environment variable, and so on. > Not if you are interested in UTC. > > If a binary zero time would do (as above), maybe it would be > > satisfactory. ;-) > Yes. OK, that's great! I've committed a patch, and I'm closing the bug with this post. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germanay).