From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58104: 29.0.50; Emacs crushers in console probably by M-w Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:09:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <868rm55pwi.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <83mtaljp1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0zwi5yf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18016"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/+ () (2022-06-11) Cc: 58104@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 28 14:25:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odW7l-0004VG-5B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:25:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odW7j-00013N-IN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odTZq-0002KN-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odTZq-00042g-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odTZq-0005Zv-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 58104-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58104.166435810221412 (code B ref 58104); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58104) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2022 09:41:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odTZV-0005ZI-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:54249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odTZU-0005Z6-KA for 58104@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 05:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:102.83.37.37]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000000BA40E.00000000633416CE.00002DE2; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:41:34 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83r0zwi5yf.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243791 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2022-09-28 05:33]: > > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:18:24 +0300 > > From: Jean Louis > > Cc: 58104@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > * Eli Zaretskii [2022-09-27 09:43]: > > > Is this a backtrace from the crash, or is this just a backtrace after > > > attaching GDB to a running Emacs? It doesn't look to me as a crash. > > > It looks like Emacs is idle waiting for input. > > > > > > Is the crash reproducible? > > > > That is backtrace after Emacs crashed. Because it is "often" > > reproducible, that is why I was running Emacs under gdb. > > It doesn't look like a crash, and the information about the fatal > signal was missing. Emacs received SIGINT, that was it. Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/