From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55414: 29.0.50; Byte compilation error for the modus-themes Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:03:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87lev46l8y.fsf@protesilaos.com> <874k1qj4eo.fsf@gnus.org> <87lev296hl.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zgjihlmw.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgjhiv8l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1875"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, info@protesilaos.com, 55414@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 15:02:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqaNE-0000EP-49 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 15:02:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqaND-00087U-5F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:02:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZSF-0004wW-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZSE-00039J-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZSE-0002wM-Fk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55414 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55414-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55414.165270259411242 (code B ref 55414); Mon, 16 May 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55414) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2022 12:03:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZRS-0002vG-CV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:20229 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZRQ-0002uy-Pk for 55414@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 97087 invoked by uid 3782); 16 May 2022 12:03:06 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15b7d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.91.125]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2022 14:03:06 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5239 invoked by uid 1000); 16 May 2022 12:03:05 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83zgjhiv8l.fsf@gnu.org> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:232378 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 14:15:38 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Cc: Protesilaos Stavrou , 55414@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 07:58:02 +0000 > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > M-: (let ((max-lisp-eval-depth (* 2 max-lisp-eval-depth))) > > (byte-compile-file > > "~/Git/Projects/modus-themes/modus-operandi-theme.e...")) > > If this compilation succeeds, then perhaps we need to increase our > > default max-lisp-eval-depth. > But do we need to do that by default in Emacs, when the problem is > local to this theme? Can't the package arrange for enlarging the > threshold only for itself? We could. But I get the feeling that there are quite a lot of places which increase max-lisp-eval-depth for their own use. Rather than increase this number of such places, couldn't we just increase the default? Put another way, is there any overwhelming disadvantage to having a larger default value of max-lisp-eval-depth, and possibly max-specpdl-size? These values are not great, particularly compared with the amount of RAM used by Emacs in general. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).