From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54079: 29.0.50; Method dispatching eratically fails Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:29:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87mtik3l54.fsf@web.de> <87ilt6bgnt.fsf@web.de> <87sfsapgv0.fsf@web.de> <87o82ypfxz.fsf@web.de> <875youbhbu.fsf@web.de> <87k0d7257t.fsf@web.de> <87wnh3zryv.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, Lars Ingebrigtsen , 54079@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 18:30:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nS08u-0002Tl-28 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 18:30:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nS08t-0003Yc-0S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nS08R-0003Y5-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nS08Q-0005N5-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS08Q-0003KY-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54079 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54079-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54079.164684697812728 (code B ref 54079); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 17:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54079) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2022 17:29:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS082-0003JE-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:40049 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nS081-0003Ij-3A for 54079@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 93262 invoked by uid 3782); 9 Mar 2022 17:29:30 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15624.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.86.36]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 18:29:29 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5635 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Mar 2022 17:29:29 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wnh3zryv.fsf@web.de> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228169 Archived-At: Hello, Michael. On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 05:10:16 +0100, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Alan Mackenzie writes: > > With the patch for bug #54248 in place (the bug you closed), does the > > following patch do anything for the current bug? > Could be...I quickly tried several times and the issue didn't show up. > But I will have to use the patch for a while to be sure. OK. So the longer I hear nothing from you, the better. ;-) Thanks! > Thanks, > Michael. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).