From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47150: [External] : bug#47150: 28.0.50; Incorrect major-mode in minibuffer Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:18:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <40f3c845-ba30-4112-bb3c-9c06c1f106d3@www.fastmail.com> <0f564ae1-ab0a-4e0f-a436-68f29b71d8a9@www.fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20240"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "47150@debbugs.gnu.org" <47150@debbugs.gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier To: Sheng Yang Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 12:19:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVtf3-00051j-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:19:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVtf2-0004BQ-J8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVtep-0004B5-CP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVteo-0001BS-Np for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVteo-0000Aa-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47150 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47150-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47150.1618222706611 (code B ref 47150); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47150) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2021 10:18:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56576 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVteE-00009n-0L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:16033 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVteB-00009Y-72 for 47150@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:18:23 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 75255 invoked by uid 3782); 12 Apr 2021 10:18:16 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15ca4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.92.164]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:18:16 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6728 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Apr 2021 10:18:15 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f564ae1-ab0a-4e0f-a436-68f29b71d8a9@www.fastmail.com> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203891 Archived-At: Hello, Sheng. On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:57:01 -0500, Sheng Yang wrote: > Any update/decision on this? The discussions have been inactive for more than 2 weeks. Sorry, I got distracted by another project which turned out to be bigger than expected. I will decide this, basically to follow Drew's suggestion, since he is the only one with strong views on the subject. What's more, I am now convinced he is right. ;-) To sum up, the minibuffer will always be in `minibuffer-mode', regardless of whether it is active or inactive. The minibuffer-mode key map will be in force for INactive MBs, the map supplied by the commands will be in force for active MBs. There will be compatibility aliases to `minibuffer-inactive-mode', etc. I think this will enable you to solve the problems you have. It will likely take me a few more days actually to implement this. [ .... ] > Sheng Yang(杨圣), PhD > Computer Science Department > University of Maryland, College Park > E-mail: styang@fastmail.com > E-mail (old but still used): yangsheng6810@gmail.com -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).