From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Randy Taylor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69186: [PATCH] Recognize functions and macros as defuns in cmake-ts-mode Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:07:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8734tq4z1p.fsf@jbornemann.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34349"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69186@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Bornemann Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 20 17:09:02 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSg1-0008cn-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:09:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSfp-0008EN-LS; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSfg-0007yS-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:08:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSfg-0005hs-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSg2-0005Pe-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Randy Taylor Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69186 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 69186-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69186.170844531420749 (code B ref 69186); Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69186) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2024 16:08:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSfZ-0005Oa-Ro for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch ([185.70.40.18]:31567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcSfS-0005OG-6f for 69186@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:08:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rjt.dev; s=protonmail; t=1708445276; x=1708704476; bh=rl/b9Ru4EMEwc8K0YLdjAA6MiRX92xFtdBoJjQblvqI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=KdzSJt16SoTEaqsnp2bBDbHhiQWtwcBrc0066k7g6mnZCFjKJQixxhwMfI8Mq+NQ1 buCeLU/UbzLLc51NlEyX+iBSGu9TCfle8nbFuOq98/T3lspHFMm1AaIDPWnnm6MiTO Qmva9KQkLSrE8nPla3ObiijXkkBgbVxQzHepLgGDA7W2Rug72HhJyH0IyeSlD9xJfC sQwip2b47ZnQS2SlFfPdjZ6iqo3dAefeCe8nsD1gEveo1efPJm/pTHdu7+PaYfV5yV j8t+nAwf26ZH7pEpVQjAIcLuxNcPMFeXzSvWsAW4fj13juItxnOiFT6ct30A7TJD3N vnGO49R4XziHg== In-Reply-To: <8734tq4z1p.fsf@jbornemann.de> Feedback-ID: 44397038:user:proton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280335 Archived-At: On Saturday, February 17th, 2024 at 15:26, J=C3=B6rg Bornemann wrote: >=20 >=20 > Tags: patch >=20 >=20 > This might exceed the lines of code for the Copyright-paperwork-exempt > marker. From my side, FSF paperwork is done and my "assignment awaits a > countersignature from the deputy directory" since a while. In the > meantime, let's have this change reviewed. Thanks, I'll try to take a look later tonight.