From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46400: [BISECTED] Sporadically breaking newline-indentation in c-mode Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:21:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <3aafe9efbe83797da7628d62401224bc3f18cfdd.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25181"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46400@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 12:22:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNq-0006Rx-Th for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:22:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNp-0005rE-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:22:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNi-0005qy-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNi-00084j-IK; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNi-0005MP-EM; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 46400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46400.161364731920596 (code B ref 46400); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2021 11:21:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNf-0005M8-9V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:21:59 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:31574 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lChNd-0005Lp-VG for 46400@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 73983 invoked by uid 3782); 18 Feb 2021 11:21:51 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15a07.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.90.7]) (using STARTTLS) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:21:50 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5602 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Feb 2021 11:21:50 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aafe9efbe83797da7628d62401224bc3f18cfdd.camel@yandex.ru> X-Submission-Agent: TMDA/1.3.x (Ph3nix) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200241 Archived-At: Hello, Konstantin. On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 00:59:08 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > Hey! Sorry: I'm replying to the wrong email because it seems I stopped > receiving notifications for the report since the last time I sent an > email here. I didn't even know there was a discussion ongoing till I > occasionally looked through the web interface ☺ The web-interface > doesn't allow to reply a specific comment, so I had to reply to an > arbitrary email, last one I got in my mailbox. Sorry. (on a side-note, > Idk what happened to notifications. I looked through spam and other > folders, tried using built-in search on my email-provider in case some > filter put them into a random folder, but emails are nowhere to be > seen. Looks like I just wasn't getting any notifications). I kept getting rejections from you mail server (something to do with my ISP's server not sending a STARTTLS operator), so in the end I stopped adding your address to the To: or Cc: headers. It might well be I messed something up when I merged this bug with the other one. I've not done merging of bugs very often. Sorry you didn't get the posts from debbugs.gnu.org. > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > A pleasure! I intend to commit the patch below in a few days time, > > if I don't hear back from anybody that it's giving trouble. This > > patch fixes the bug when applied to that commit from December > > (9022df70270243f211c54ccd66800320148b8434). It should apply cleanly > > to master. > Oh, this is amazing! I'll give the patch a try as well. I assume though > there will be nothing to report (well, other than "Thank you for fixing > the bug" 😉), but if I happen to find some other problem, I'll make > sure to drop an email either here or to a new report :) Thank you, indeed! I haven't committed the patch, yet, and I'll leave off a few days yet. It's surprising just how often asking people to check patches for their bugs gets a reply that things aren't properly fixed. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).