From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44664: 28.0.50; troubles with some chars in term Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:41:32 +0300 Message-ID: References: <873617m4tv.fsf@gnus.org> <834klmr989.fsf@gnu.org> <83d00apm6q.fsf@gnu.org> <833615pglp.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1opnwzs.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfexntmr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21880"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 44664@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 19 18:46:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kfo0c-0005YR-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:46:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33434 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfo0a-0000Dm-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:46:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfo0R-0000Bd-Fk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57557) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfo0P-0006NC-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfo0P-0005oi-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:46:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44664 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 44664-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44664.160580790822296 (code B ref 44664); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2020 17:45:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfnzY-0005nX-F8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from static.rcdrun.com ([95.85.24.50]:45879) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfnzW-0005mq-Qo for 44664@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.56]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by static.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 00000000002C1AE3.000000005FB6AF18.00000CBE; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:44:54 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83lfexntmr.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193738 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2020-11-19 20:29]: > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 19:53:02 +0300 > > From: Jean Louis > > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 44664@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > If I do following with X or with -nw: > > > > $ export TERM=eterm > > > > then I can use terminal and the line is not disappearing, it is black > > white but it works well. In that case arrows do not work, but I can > > use jk instead and other keys. > > > > Does that maybe mean that some color control sequences are not handled > > correctly? > > Could be. Are colors the only difference between eterm and > eterm-color? For now I see that arrows do not work as expected. They work in prompt, not in mutt as arrows. Function keys are anyway not bound in M-x term or ansi-term to terminal, but to Emacs.