From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: emacser via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45844: 27.1; unwanted raising of other frame when emacs is in the backgound and switch-to-buffer is used in a dedicated frame Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:39:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <698ea7a3-c2b2-7705-3fc4-16d52c8a7acd@gmx.at> <7420050f-39bc-61ce-5f04-706f0b63e3e8@gmx.at> <2ffee8ea-15af-a54c-ac5c-b214b299535d@gmx.at> Reply-To: emacser , emacser Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28797"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "45844@debbugs.gnu.org" <45844@debbugs.gnu.org> To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 10:43:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzzAK-0007Kr-NR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:43:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47414 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzzAJ-0001YI-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzz7m-0007vc-B0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzz7m-0001c0-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzz7l-00088M-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: emacser Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45844 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45844-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45844.161061721031190 (code B ref 45844); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2021 09:40:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzz6v-00086x-Tl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:23703) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzz6t-000866-Cj for 45844@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 04:40:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1610617200; bh=CO1rkm6OuPPEv8FeSU5/g6b98u77PHEhWX111Ju+MFg=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xqju1FFS0a3aDXNxHlFHdK63pnlMPYyqE1ICVNymnyIVzMxTZv55YsMENe4s84BSj LNydb2wNPyIHyfTSQ9uk5o83lmyz0OHDIN/eBiTh/3xS8Z34D4f1xLlfVgdmCSHbIO xYJgF4Gkupinbj/GbETUW43cU0cJ6gAFQFIW3XO0= In-Reply-To: <2ffee8ea-15af-a54c-ac5c-b214b299535d@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197937 Archived-At: > > It's by no means hard to implement (preventing a new frame from getting > raised is much harder). But we cannot change the semantics of > `switch-to-buffer' in this regard. As long as window managers permit us > to do that, it will raise the frame it uses and give it focus. > OK, the bug can be closed then if it's wontfix.