From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58554: Bash functions with hyphen not showing up in speedbar Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 16:42:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <835ygk5lgl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Heime Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33360"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58554@debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 18:44:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6kS-0008UD-2A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:44:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56420 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6kQ-00014S-Bz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6k8-00013n-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6k7-0005OR-26 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6k6-0001CD-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Heime Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 16:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58554 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58554-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58554.16659385854525 (code B ref 58554); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 16:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58554) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2022 16:43:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45965 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6jA-0001Av-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4318.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.18]:36397) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6j8-0001AP-Rp for 58554@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:43:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1665938576; x=1666197776; bh=ZT3GmHKKbq6AgpaSjV6jGzHqWIIHXwAs/fr3pwqDPz0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=jZONoqC5ySXrHJXBvv40Sjr9hnuMoAYHn9kKSoihq2scEtgl2CdRhmuN53tVHB0kW Uxaii3DwhfLQzswT3tdL7S6WS9oqR3prjRyxaxTyZQI2dpJHoaBCDkjbIhpjKpb9kw +zIJ1tjQJOAihJKVUFHA76aGU5lQQ26H3zZZcNr01j68gKGIskWzUAdzKPWnoPJlrS AXCSFDu9CzEwNgAmpFgQ07m9t7h0LodRROvYCQSD40eL4wcfkdKp5wszv7qLP9otlm miUX06uV1sgYehe7e+Z1mkWEnVYwtXHo1cRbjaak5ZRvk9DWN4TnUfGjJ1nC3ZSzYg AJvNerZU5SXBw== In-Reply-To: <835ygk5lgl.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:245663 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Sunday, October 16th, 2022 at 6:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrot= e: > > Cc: 58554@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 04:19:35 +0000 > > From: Heime via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > >=20 > > Ignoring bug reports as act of spite. Is this a new trend? >=20 >=20 > Bug reports are not ignored here. But we don't always have ideas for > how to solve a particular bug, or the manpower or expertise to work on > that. Then the bug could, unfortunately, stay unsolved for prolonged > periods of time. >=20 > Pinging an unsolved bug report is OK. But reporting it again under a > different number just adds to the workload of the maintainers, so > please make a point of pinging the original bug report (by replying to > the same NNNN@debbugs.gnu.org address, where NNNN is the original bug > number). I am new to this and unaware about pinging an unsolved bug report. That's what I had in mind.