From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: emacs misbehaves without --unibyte Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:58:45 +0300 (IDT) Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020529085604.GA499186@bruegel.RZ.TU-Ilmenau.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022663329 32456 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 09:08:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17CzRo-0008RN-00 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 11:08:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CzST-00081V-00; Wed, 29 May 2002 05:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CzKO-0007GA-00 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 05:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA29407; Wed, 29 May 2002 11:58:45 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Paul Stoeber In-Reply-To: <20020529085604.GA499186@bruegel.RZ.TU-Ilmenau.DE> Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:1665 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:1665 On Wed, 29 May 2002, Paul Stoeber wrote: > I once had the same problem with smbclient. I wanted to use it in a script, > but didn't want to sacrifice any robustness. So I added a --batch-ouput > option, which was really effortless because all the data was at hand in the > C code, it was just a matter of changing the `printf's. I made the output > so that it was (a) unambiguous and (b) easy to parse. And the script > has been performing nicely without any glitches ever since. > > Maybe that's not an option for Emacs because it wants to use whatever > /bin/ls is available on the system. Exactly. GNU `ls' already has such an option, but there are many `ls' varieties out there that don't support it.