From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: `print' does not print Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:46:26 +0200 (IST) Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3C9F856C.7AA816CC@sgi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017121700 7532 127.0.0.1 (26 Mar 2002 05:48:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ralf@akutech.de, rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, drk@bobo.hudson.sgi.com Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pjoh-0001xN-00 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 06:48:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pjof-0003k8-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:48:17 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pjo5-0003jF-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA23122; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:46:26 +0200 (IST) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: David Kaelbling In-Reply-To: <3C9F856C.7AA816CC@sgi.com> Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:181 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:181 On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, David Kaelbling wrote: > > > Afterwards emacs 21 worked, although it is not quite right: it gives > > > dbx fits, and is subject to runaway memory growth and sporadic > > > crashes. > > > > That's very strange: I use stock Emacs 21.1 on SGI Irix 6.5 all the > > time, and I have yet to see a single crash. dbx seems to work on it > > reasonably well, but I didn't debug Emacs on that machine enough to > > have a firm opinion. > > Are you running on a pre-6.5.10 system without the compiler_eoe > patches? That seems to be a factor. It sounds like I have version 6.5.14m of the OS here. But if you tell me what to look for in the output of versions(1), I can give a more precise answer. > > Did you link your Emacs with optional graphics libraries (XPM, TIFF, > > etc.), and if so, are those dynamic libraries or static libraries? > > Yes, using shared libraries from http://freeware.sgi.com/. Actually we > discussed this last November when I first submitted the patch. > (Subject: unexelf.c failure on IRIX) Yes, but I forgot ;-). Anyway, I don't know if this is a factor, but my libraries are all built from sources, and I linked them in statically.