Thank you very much for the patch, and sorry for the very very late feedback. I had a look through it, and I noticed that in math-binary-modulo-args of the code w is also tested for not being nil. Looking at it more closely I saw that word width is also taken into account when doing binary operation with modulo forms.

I can see no reason why modulo form would need some special nil case, and I suspect that at some point of time the bit-width clipping could be disabled by setting the width to nil. So now, don't we have two conventions in the code : 0 and nil. If so, that would be unfortunate for maintanability.

Also, concerning your comment about the rotate right by n bits of numbers with non zero least significant n bits, and with disabled bit width clipping, Calc has the infinite mode (press 'm i'), so if you decide some day to make this sort of implementation, then you should emit an error w/o infinite mode, but have a +inf with infinite mode. A bit (n-1) equal to 1 won't cause any -inf, because two complement signing is not possible with disabled bit width clipping, as this would result in an infinite number of FFFFFF with negative finite numbers.

I also notice that when two's complement signing display is on (type 'O d 6'), and bit width is set to 0 to disable bit width clipping, then the signing display is done as if the TwosComp mode was off. I think that it is OK to do that, but when 'b w 0 RET' or 'O d 6' is pressed, which ever comes last, and we have this conflict, then a warning message should be emitted, something like « Twos complement sign display is ignored when bit word width is not specified ».

De : Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
Envoyé : mardi 13 octobre 2020 11:56
À : Vincent Belaïche <vincent.b.1@hotmail.fr>
Cc : Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>; 43764-done@debbugs.gnu.org <43764-done@debbugs.gnu.org>
Objet : Re: bug#43764: Calc shift right broken

9 okt. 2020 kl. 17.34 skrev Vincent Belaïche <vincent.b.1@hotmail.fr>:

> • set bit width 0 would remove the automatic clipping meaning infinite width.

The previously mentioned patch implementing this has now been pushed to Emacs master. Thanks again for the suggestion!

I should also note the rationale for disabling left/right rotation when the word size is set to zero: while it would make sense to define

(rotate-left x 1) =>
x≥0: (shift-left x 1)
x<0: (+ (shift-left x 1) 1)

(rotate-right x 1) =>
x≥0, x even: (shift-right x 1)
x<0, x odd: (shift-right x 1),

the two remaining cases of rotate right with {x≥0, x odd} or {x<0, x even} cannot result in a finite integer.

If someone has a better idea, or would like rotation to be implemented as a partial function according to the above definition, please comment. For now the bug is closed.