From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dean via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46702: Link symbol name in Help Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:09:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <874ki4kuy8.fsf@gnus.org> <838s7gw0zf.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2ffeqh0.fsf@gnus.org> <83im6jv4we.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Peter Dean Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17641"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "larsi@gnus.org" , "46702@debbugs.gnu.org" <46702@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 08:10:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpn-0004Tg-BI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:10:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpm-00029V-6S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:10:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpa-00029D-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpa-0001g6-3E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpZ-0000G6-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Peter Dean Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46702.1614064181959 (code B ref 46702); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2021 07:09:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpE-0000FP-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]:56387) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lERpC-0000FC-Rt for 46702@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:09:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1614064172; bh=eQ5syHbrP/YNWbIUqArnXcQhmNImtrUwbzFWmiQQDwE=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ifLqqGfCHq+ekzUFzHAduQqraj8rPNLW/3f2g5ZpZoIGhRXrtW1NuwpDyftrZw7DZ f8uPxSKnWLGnucsVPm5bAOZAdZiVofhQQZZIJIcGGydxCAjeCvRmdNOZdqmZtManWd cQK3iFGKOuWWCCL9eqIQGPORdt9men2SfvdiWna4= In-Reply-To: <83im6jv4we.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" X-ACL-Warn: , Peter Dean Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200643 Archived-At: On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:28 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I'm not sure that's a good idea: "Documentation:" ends in a colon, so > the text should follow it. Otherwise it might look unrelated. What do you think of Lars' idea of removing that line altogether, since it's obvious the user is looking at the documentation (the user invoked the command)?