From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: scame via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:31:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8335xa25wy.fsf@gnu.org> <_H0XqIXt1dfP3H0t7B5ffiqUQfbMsO6VjonudikF85OIm5y8BWOkrXn4_dedZzvdxv4o5Ug2rhFkFqAqNuS9-XIKRsSy2P4IBrBE5QMtK9I=@protonmail.com> <83y2f2zrz6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: scame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "46926@debbugs.gnu.org" <46926@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 04 21:42:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHunp-0006bR-0h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:42:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuno-0000Lq-2o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:42:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHuec-0007zQ-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHueb-00047d-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHueb-0004zd-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: scame Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.161488993318567 (code B ref 46926); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2021 20:32:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHudo-0004pA-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40130.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.130]:54046) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHudl-0004i1-NW for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:32:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1614889923; bh=pFBuunjActL96v5em5rWsj9XBfmo0Ulbcm1AmL2pm7s=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FW3AOvnzCc23EnKBhzlIh/oKdhXJA1qJIIF3OmIYIZx5w91PEazA1DtKsHAEuuIMh YpBECvQK79o4YkuU42No35r/7bVK5UfE7d1k4xxHqaFaDZrYwuym76pIPWQea5nirh Cn5FLwE7AphmICzkfy4t5swpRq+pjAE4QI7myqNA= In-Reply-To: <83y2f2zrz6.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" X-ACL-Warn: , scame Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201464 Archived-At: > > We could discuss whether the face alone is enough in Info. My > personal opinion is that it isn't enough: the face we use there > doesn't guarantee any highlighting, because the user could customize > the face to be anything but. There can be an option to show quotes or not. If the user removes the face's coloring, etc. then he can turn on displaying quotes. Currently, the face has attributes by default, so the default experience can benefit from the cleaner look without quotes.