From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: carlmarcos--- via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56171: Request for marking DEF entry when using completing-read Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:11:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <87v8sqqu0y.fsf@gnus.org-N5K4ctK----2> Reply-To: carlmarcos@tutanota.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_574395_1928763379.1656083519954" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5205"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56171@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 24 18:50:23 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mVi-00016n-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 18:50:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mVg-0004yo-WF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:50:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mVP-0004xV-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mVP-0003J6-3E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mVP-0003Vi-0k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:50:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: carlmarcos@tutanota.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56171 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56171-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56171.165608934713393 (code B ref 56171); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2022 16:49:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43333 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4mUU-0003Tu-Ak for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]:47876) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4kyb-0004fY-R8 for 56171@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F56FA07CD; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1656083519; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=A98DWlAv83MRNQmuVhw9KZPpdzu03jBDxv8QPSTAKSI=; b=em1+c6ITSTPZWmb4ZBCl5leICeJiAXI9cR8E1ZmdiG7vPkpn8DlUgESe8ShIkFGq 4BveS34igX89okxCffdR4w6qyEgD1SW0+SH0i+GOPfvPJH//lGsalmpkFXKKdSwyFpK 3+4gpVEFuWULPSp9arcQagnnRptGjAS8p3bYe11wfC9bpFOAVdQEbD8DxGAQS6idfPY VsFrJqC3P+pYXJYt6+Z3WhNQ1XGcMRSj9eMp3tWA3HTieU44yQ0XzfJPKpYvVUFeGz2 JUqYWVvCYwRLzA440WGw/JJOyI5yvCaKM1HjS/Ng9+uGH8iYXrucdX6utL+LXtIcMLe vP+WiUe8xg== In-Reply-To: <87v8sqqu0y.fsf@gnus.org-N5K4ctK----2> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 12:49:05 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235202 Archived-At: ------=_Part_574395_1928763379.1656083519954 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jun 24, 2022, 09:40 by larsi@gnus.org: > carlmarcos@tutanota.com writes: > >> It would be valuable to mark the default entry when users scroll >> through the options defined for `completing-read` whenever a DEF is >> supplied. >> > > This is for `M-n', I guess? > > I'm not quite sure I see the use case here. When do you want to have > the default value specially marked when going through `M-n'? > It is a different thing than that.=C2=A0 I customarily using the `up' and `= down' key to move through the collection of entries.=C2=A0 Could there be some form o= f indicator (e.g. highlight, underline, some other means) that will tell me that is was= selected as the default by the package designer?=C2=A0 Currently I see no distinctio= n, with all=C2=A0 entries in collection as just an entry like any other.=20 ------=_Part_574395_1928763379.1656083519954 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jun 24, 2022, 09:40 by larsi@gnus.org:
carlmarcos@tutanota.com writes:
=
It would be valuable to mark the default entry when = users scroll
through the options defined for `completing-read= ` whenever a DEF is
supplied.

=
This is for `M-n', I guess?

I'm not= quite sure I see the use case here. When do you want to have
the default value specially marked when going through `M-n'?
It is a different thing than that.  I cust= omarily using the `up' and `down' key
to move th= rough the collection of entries.  Could there be some form of indicato= r
(e.g. highlight, underline, some other means) = that will tell me that is was selected
as the de= fault by the package designer?  Currently I see no distinction, with a= ll 
entries in collection as just an entry = like any other.

------=_Part_574395_1928763379.1656083519954--