From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40990: Improve message-mode and isearch icons Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 07:17:38 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0zvey3.fsf@gnu.org> <45991686-81b4-a27d-6367-f01bbc20ab10@yandex.ru> <838siavor9.fsf@gnu.org> <3e8277b7-c3dd-56e9-4b40-b817aae264d4@yandex.ru> <835zd3ci7d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="100194"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 06:18:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXztP-000Pxe-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:18:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXztN-0002qK-GQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXztC-0002np-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXztC-0002YM-F1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXztC-0007iB-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 04:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D40990.158917067029617 (code D ref 40990); Mon, 11 May 2020 04:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40990-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 04:17:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXzsz-0007hd-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50774) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXzsx-0007hQ-Ue for 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXzss-0002Lg-HE; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.12.137.152] (port=33638 helo=[10.212.174.103]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jXzsr-0007Oa-T2; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:17:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180051 Archived-At: On May 11, 2020 5:46:03 AM GMT+03:00, Dmitry Gutov wro= te: > On 11=2E05=2E2020 05:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > You are just listing the advantages of releasing frequently=2E No one > > will argue with that, the problem is how to make that happen without > > hurting stability=2E >=20 > I don't think it's possible not to sacrifice stability at all=2E It will >=20 > most likely go down in XX=2E1 releases, at least to some extent=2E The stability already goes down in NN=2E1 versions, that's why we always h= ave a NN=2E2 version to follow=2E We are talking about how much more it wi= ll decrease=2E If you have practical suggestions for how to keep the insta= bility in check while making more frequent releases, I'm all ears=2E